PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SETM vs. BKGI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SETM vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SETM vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SETM
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
14.27%95.27%-13.24%-11.03%
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
10.41%37.53%12.35%2.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SETM achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly higher than BKGI's 10.41% return.


SETM

1D
5.82%
1M
-14.37%
YTD
14.27%
6M
33.70%
1Y
137.98%
3Y*
26.40%
5Y*
10Y*

BKGI

1D
1.11%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
10.41%
6M
15.93%
1Y
32.81%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SETM vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SETM and BKGI have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Return for Risk

SETM vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SETM
SETM Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SETM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SETM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BKGI
BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SETM vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SETMBKGIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.03

2.25

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

2.84

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.08

3.13

+1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.14

15.90

+1.23

SETM vs. BKGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SETM Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the BKGI Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SETM and BKGI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SETMBKGIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

2.25

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

1.66

-1.14

Correlation

The correlation between SETM and BKGI is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SETM vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than BKGI's 2.40% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
SETM
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
1.37%1.56%2.07%2.47%0.00%
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
2.40%2.65%4.55%4.55%0.53%

Drawdowns

SETM vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SETM drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETM and BKGI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SETMBKGIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-14.79%

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-10.35%

-15.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.74%

-3.76%

-12.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-2.60%

-11.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.67%

2.04%

+5.63%

Volatility

SETM vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) has a higher volatility of 18.23% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 4.74%. This indicates that SETM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SETMBKGIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.23%

4.74%

+13.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.72%

7.91%

+28.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.92%

14.67%

+31.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.22%

14.07%

+22.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.22%

14.07%

+22.15%