PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SETH vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SETH vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SETH achieves a 40.93% return, which is significantly higher than SSO's 19.37% return.


SETH

1D
5.62%
1M
29.74%
YTD
40.93%
6M
46.51%
1Y
-1.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SSO

1D
-1.40%
1M
9.75%
YTD
19.37%
6M
18.81%
1Y
52.69%
3Y*
37.56%
5Y*
19.62%
10Y*
24.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SETH vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
40.93%-29.41%-49.59%-22.80%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
19.37%26.19%43.48%21.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SETH and SSO is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023

-0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SETH vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SETH
SETH Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SETH vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SETHSSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.38

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

2.91

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.04

12.80

-12.84

SETH vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SETH and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SETHSSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

2.25

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.42

-0.86

Drawdowns

SETH vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, roughly equal to the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SETHSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.74%

-84.67%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.01%

-18.17%

-37.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.29%

-1.40%

-59.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.79%

-19.57%

-35.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.77%

4.13%

+31.64%

Volatility

SETH vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.66%. This indicates that SETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SETHSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

5.66%

+4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.07%

17.78%

+28.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.54%

23.60%

+44.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.53%

33.65%

+35.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.53%

35.89%

+33.64%

SETH vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

SETH vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, more than SSO's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
10.91%7.01%3.44%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.62%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SETH and SSO have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SETH has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to SSO (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SETH dropped -80.74% vs SSO's -84.67%.

On 1-year performance, SSO leads with 52.69% vs -1.33% for SETH. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SSO has performed better with a 52.69% return vs -1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.

SETH has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 0.62% for SSO.

SETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SETH and 0.87% for SSO.

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SETH and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer