SETH vs. OBTC
SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) and OBTC (Osprey Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%) while OBTC tracks the Bitcoin (BTC). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SETH returned 27.48% vs -36.26% for OBTC. Their -0.76 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for OBTC.
Performance
SETH vs. OBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SETH achieves a 29.49% return, which is significantly higher than OBTC's -27.35% return.
SETH
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -10.05%
- 6M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 29.49%
- 1Y
- 27.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -31.12%
OBTC
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- 6M
- -18.32%
- YTD
- -27.35%
- 1Y
- -36.26%
- 3Y*
- 42.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -6.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.84K | $177.33K | $209.11K | |
| $1.09M | $1.16M | $1.85M |
SETH vs. OBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 29.49% | -29.41% | -49.59% | -22.19% |
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | -27.35% | -1.87% | 130.89% | 34.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SETH and OBTC is -0.88, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023 | -0.76 |
The correlation between SETH and OBTC shifts across timeframes, from -0.88 (1 year) to -0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SETH vs. OBTC — Risk / Return Rank
SETH
OBTC
SETH vs. OBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SETH | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.88 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | -0.73 | +1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | -1.17 | +2.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SETH vs. OBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, smaller than the maximum OBTC drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and OBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETH | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.74% | -94.50% | +13.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.71% | -49.62% | +19.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -83.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.43% | -63.72% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.12% | -69.41% | +14.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.71% | 31.09% | -13.38% |
Volatility
SETH vs. OBTC - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a higher volatility of 12.55% compared to Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) at 8.93%. This indicates that SETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SETH | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.55% | 8.93% | +3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.56% | 34.12% | +11.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.05% | 44.99% | +22.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.84% | 56.37% | +12.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.84% | 76.21% | -7.37% |
SETH vs. OBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OBTC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SETH vs. OBTC - Dividend Comparison
SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.11%, while OBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 22.11% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SETH and OBTC have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SETH has higher volatility (12.55%) compared to OBTC (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SETH dropped -80.74% vs OBTC's -94.50%.
On 1-year performance, SETH leads with 27.48% vs -36.26% for OBTC. On fees, OBTC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, OBTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a 27.48% return vs -36.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OBTC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.
SETH has the higher dividend yield at 22.11%, compared with 0.00% for OBTC.
SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%), while OBTC tracks Bitcoin (BTC). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Osprey. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SETH and 0.49% for OBTC.
SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SETH and OBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer