SETH vs. MSBT
SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%) while MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.91, they often move in opposite directions. SETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
SETH vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SETH
- 1D
- 5.62%
- 1M
- 29.74%
- YTD
- 40.93%
- 6M
- 46.51%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -18.41%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETH vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 21.09% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SETH and MSBT is -0.91, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | -0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SETH vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank
SETH
MSBT
SETH vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SETH | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SETH | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | -1.33 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
SETH vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETH | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.74% | -20.25% | -60.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.29% | -20.25% | -41.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.79% | -3.91% | -50.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.77% | — | — |
Volatility
SETH vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SETH | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.54% | 32.92% | +35.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.53% | 32.92% | +36.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.53% | 32.92% | +36.61% |
SETH vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
SETH vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, while MSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 10.91% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SETH and MSBT have a correlation of -0.91, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.
SETH has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 0.00% for MSBT.
SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%), while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SETH and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for SETH and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer