SETH vs. CBOO
SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - SETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%), while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. SETH is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. SETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
SETH vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SETH achieves a 48.48% return, which is significantly higher than CBOO's 0.10% return.
SETH
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 19.90%
- YTD
- 48.48%
- 6M
- 48.59%
- 1Y
- -6.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETH vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 48.48% | 42.59% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.10% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SETH and CBOO is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | -0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SETH vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
SETH
CBOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SETH vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SETH | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SETH vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETH | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.74% | -2.34% | -78.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.21% | -1.58% | -57.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.80% | -1.60% | -53.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.80% | — | — |
Volatility
SETH vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SETH | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.21% | 2.07% | +67.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.66% | 2.07% | +67.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.66% | 2.07% | +67.59% |
SETH vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SETH vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 10.36% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SETH and CBOO have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.
SETH has the higher dividend yield at 10.36%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.
SETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SETH and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for SETH and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer