PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SESVX vs. VRTVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SESVX vs. VRTVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Value Fund (SESVX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SESVX achieves a 13.25% return, which is significantly lower than VRTVX's 17.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SESVX has underperformed VRTVX with an annualized return of 8.74%, while VRTVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.34% annualized return.


SESVX

1D
-0.95%
1M
0.12%
YTD
13.25%
6M
14.08%
1Y
35.49%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
8.74%

VRTVX

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.19%
YTD
17.44%
6M
16.47%
1Y
42.05%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
10.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SESVX vs. VRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SESVX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Value Fund
13.25%13.26%8.13%15.54%-12.26%29.58%1.04%21.94%-17.08%7.61%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
17.44%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SESVX and VRTVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.98

The correlation between SESVX and VRTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SESVX vs. VRTVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SESVX
SESVX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SESVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SESVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SESVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SESVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SESVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SESVX vs. VRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Value Fund (SESVX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SESVXVRTVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

4.87

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.32

16.53

-5.22

SESVX vs. VRTVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SESVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the VRTVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SESVX and VRTVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SESVXVRTVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.32

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.31

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.44

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.47

-0.04

Drawdowns

SESVX vs. VRTVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SESVX drawdown since its inception was -61.79%, which is greater than VRTVX's maximum drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SESVX and VRTVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SESVXVRTVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.79%

-45.98%

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-8.54%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.41%

-26.85%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-26.85%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.73%

-45.98%

-4.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-1.50%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-7.78%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.51%

+0.56%

Volatility

SESVX vs. VRTVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Value Fund (SESVX) is 4.70%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that SESVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SESVXVRTVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

5.01%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

12.04%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

18.00%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.00%

21.67%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.85%

23.71%

+1.14%

SESVX vs. VRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SESVX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SESVX vs. VRTVX - Dividend Comparison

SESVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than VRTVX's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SESVX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Value Fund
8.03%9.15%21.17%3.05%5.69%8.19%0.77%1.27%12.44%9.21%0.55%6.93%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.60%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SESVX and VRTVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VRTVX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to SESVX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SESVX dropped -61.79% vs VRTVX's -45.98%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SESVX and VRTVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer