SEPZ vs. PAYH
SEPZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF) and PAYH (TrueShares S&P Autocallable High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEPZ is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index September, while PAYH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by TrueShares. SEPZ is passively managed, while PAYH is actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEPZ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for PAYH.
Performance
SEPZ vs. PAYH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SEPZ having a 5.77% return and PAYH slightly higher at 5.88%.
SEPZ
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- —
PAYH
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- 5.88%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEPZ vs. PAYH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF | 5.77% | -0.48% |
PAYH TrueShares S&P Autocallable High Income ETF | 5.88% | -0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEPZ and PAYH is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEPZ vs. PAYH — Risk / Return Rank
SEPZ
PAYH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEPZ vs. PAYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) and TrueShares S&P Autocallable High Income ETF (PAYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEPZ | PAYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.74 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEPZ vs. PAYH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.22%, smaller than the maximum PAYH drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPZ and PAYH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEPZ | PAYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -16.33% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -3.55% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -2.71% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | — | — |
Volatility
SEPZ vs. PAYH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEPZ | PAYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 22.78% | -12.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 22.78% | -10.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 22.78% | -10.29% |
SEPZ vs. PAYH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEPZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PAYH's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEPZ vs. PAYH - Dividend Comparison
SEPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than PAYH's 6.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAYH TrueShares S&P Autocallable High Income ETF | 6.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF | 2.08% | 2.20% | 3.62% | 3.55% | 0.69% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEPZ and PAYH have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAYH is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAYH is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SEPZ.
PAYH has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 2.08% for SEPZ.
SEPZ is categorized as Options Trading, while PAYH is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SEPZ and 0.74% for PAYH.
Find the right allocation for SEPZ and PAYH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer