SEPZ vs. OCTQ
SEPZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF) and OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. SEPZ is passively managed, while OCTQ is actively managed. SEPZ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OCTQ.
Performance
SEPZ vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SEPZ
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- —
OCTQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEPZ vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF | 7.50% |
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% |
SEPZ vs. OCTQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEPZ
OCTQ
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SEPZ
OCTQ
Financial Services
SEPZ
OCTQ
Consumer Cyclical
SEPZ
OCTQ
Communication Services
SEPZ
OCTQ
Healthcare
SEPZ
OCTQ
Industrials
SEPZ
OCTQ
Consumer Defensive
SEPZ
OCTQ
Energy
SEPZ
OCTQ
Utilities
SEPZ
OCTQ
Real Estate
SEPZ
OCTQ
Basic Materials
SEPZ
OCTQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEPZ vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank
SEPZ
OCTQ
SEPZ vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEPZ | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEPZ | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SEPZ vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.22%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPZ and OCTQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEPZ | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | 0.00% | -15.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | 0.00% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | 0.00% | -2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | — | — |
Volatility
SEPZ vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEPZ | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 0.00% | +9.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 0.00% | +12.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.46% | 0.00% | +12.46% |
SEPZ vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEPZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEPZ vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison
SEPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while OCTQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF | 2.03% | 2.20% | 3.62% | 3.55% | 0.69% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, OCTQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SEPZ.
SEPZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.00% for OCTQ.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SEPZ and 0.79% for OCTQ.
Find the right allocation for SEPZ and OCTQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer