PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEPZ vs. JULZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SEPZ vs. JULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) and Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SEPZ vs. JULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SEPZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF
-3.90%13.18%18.23%17.94%-8.51%21.83%5.95%
JULZ
Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF
-4.68%13.23%18.76%17.65%-9.34%20.66%5.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPZ achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly higher than JULZ's -4.68% return.


SEPZ

1D
2.19%
1M
-3.68%
YTD
-3.90%
6M
-1.98%
1Y
12.38%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*

JULZ

1D
2.26%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
-4.68%
6M
-3.09%
1Y
11.99%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SEPZ vs. JULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEPZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than JULZ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SEPZ vs. JULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPZ
SEPZ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SEPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

JULZ
JULZ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
JULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
JULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPZ vs. JULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) and Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEPZJULZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.86

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

1.32

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.35

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.37

5.61

+0.76

SEPZ vs. JULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the JULZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPZ and JULZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEPZJULZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.86

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.77

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.97

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between SEPZ and JULZ is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SEPZ vs. JULZ - Dividend Comparison

SEPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than JULZ's 12.55% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
SEPZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF
2.28%2.20%3.62%3.55%0.69%0.05%
JULZ
Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF
12.55%11.96%3.30%3.59%0.07%0.00%

Drawdowns

SEPZ vs. JULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.22%, roughly equal to the maximum JULZ drawdown of -14.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPZ and JULZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SEPZJULZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.22%

-14.71%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-9.10%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.22%

-14.71%

-0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-6.46%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-3.04%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.20%

-0.20%

Volatility

SEPZ vs. JULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) is 3.95%, while Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that SEPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SEPZJULZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

4.42%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

8.13%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

14.04%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.30%

12.18%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.53%

12.36%

+0.17%