PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEPW vs. HOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEPW vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Sep ETF (SEPW) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SEPW

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.55%
YTD
3.80%
6M
4.23%
1Y
12.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEPW vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEPW vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPW
SEPW Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SEPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPW Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

HOCT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPW vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Sep ETF (SEPW) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEPWHOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.17

SEPW vs. HOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEPWHOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

Drawdowns

SEPW vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPW drawdown since its inception was -8.43%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPW and HOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEPWHOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

0.00%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

0.00%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

Volatility

SEPW vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEPWHOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.72%

0.00%

+4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.45%

0.00%

+6.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.45%

0.00%

+6.45%

SEPW vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEPW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEPW vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEPW nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, SEPW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEPW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.

SEPW and HOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SEPW and 0.79% for HOCT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEPW and HOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer