PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEPU vs. ZAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEPU vs. ZAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF (SEPU) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPU achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly higher than ZAPR's 2.99% return.


SEPU

1D
-2.54%
1M
0.10%
YTD
6.03%
6M
5.65%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZAPR

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.26%
YTD
2.99%
6M
3.39%
1Y
6.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEPU vs. ZAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SEPU and ZAPR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.66

The correlation between SEPU and ZAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEPU vs. ZAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPU
SEPU Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SEPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPU Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ZAPR
ZAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ZAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPU vs. ZAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF (SEPU) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEPUZAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

2.21

-0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

17.30

-14.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.13

87.14

-75.01

SEPU vs. ZAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPU Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the ZAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPU and ZAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEPUZAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

4.66

-2.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

2.84

-1.61

Drawdowns

SEPU vs. ZAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPU drawdown since its inception was -11.76%, which is greater than ZAPR's maximum drawdown of -1.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPU and ZAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEPUZAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-1.72%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-0.40%

-5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-0.28%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-0.09%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

0.08%

+1.47%

Volatility

SEPU vs. ZAPR - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF (SEPU) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR) at 0.48%. This indicates that SEPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEPUZAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

0.48%

+3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.31%

1.05%

+6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.72%

1.49%

+8.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.90%

2.52%

+8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.90%

2.52%

+8.38%

SEPU vs. ZAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEPU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than ZAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEPU vs. ZAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEPU nor ZAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SEPU and ZAPR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEPU has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to ZAPR (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEPU dropped -11.76% vs ZAPR's -1.72%.

On 1-year performance, SEPU leads with 18.78% vs 6.92% for ZAPR. On fees, SEPU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, ZAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEPU has performed better with a 18.78% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEPU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZAPR.

SEPU and ZAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SEPU and 0.79% for ZAPR.

ZAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.66 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEPU and ZAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer