SEPU vs. JULW

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SEPU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF) and JULW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEPU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while JULW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SEPU returned 18.78% vs 13.12% for JULW. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

SEPU vs. JULW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF (SEPU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPU achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly higher than JULW's 3.72% return.

SEPU

• 1D: -2.54%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 6.03%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 18.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULW

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 3.72%
• 6M: 4.28%
• 1Y: 13.12%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEPU vs. JULW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SEPU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF	6.03%	12.32%	4.59%
JULW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF	3.72%	11.57%	3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SEPU and JULW is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.92

The correlation between SEPU and JULW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SEPU vs. JULW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPU

SEPU Risk / Return Rank: 65
SEPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SEPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SEPU Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SEPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SEPU Martin Ratio Rank: 70

JULW

JULW Risk / Return Rank: 91
JULW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
JULW Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
JULW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
JULW Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
JULW Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPU vs. JULW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF (SEPU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEPU	JULW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.84	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	4.45	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.63	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	4.45	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.13	25.02	-12.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEPU vs. JULW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPU Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the JULW Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPU and JULW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEPU	JULW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	2.84	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	1.39	-0.16

Drawdowns

SEPU vs. JULW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPU drawdown since its inception was -11.76%, which is greater than JULW's maximum drawdown of -9.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPU and JULW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEPU	JULW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.76%	-9.49%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.23%	-2.96%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.73%	-0.16%	-2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.72%	-0.91%	-0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	0.53%	+1.02%

Volatility

SEPU vs. JULW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF (SEPU) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF (JULW) at 0.30%. This indicates that SEPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JULW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEPU	JULW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	0.30%	+3.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.31%	3.23%	+4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.72%	4.65%	+5.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.90%	6.88%	+4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.90%	6.53%	+4.37%

SEPU vs. JULW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SEPU and JULW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

SEPU vs. JULW - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEPU nor JULW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JULW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.04%
SEPU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEPU and JULW in my portfolio?

SEPU and JULW have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEPU or JULW?

SEPU has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to JULW (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEPU dropped -11.76% vs JULW's -9.49%.

Which ETF is better, SEPU or JULW?

On 1-year performance, SEPU leads with 18.78% vs 13.12% for JULW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, JULW has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEPU or JULW?

Over the 1-year period, SEPU has performed better with a 18.78% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEPU or JULW?

SEPU and JULW have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEPU or JULW?

SEPU and JULW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SEPU and JULW?

SEPU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while JULW is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JULW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.