SEPU vs. EAPR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SEPU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. SEPU is actively managed, while EAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, SEPU returned 19.41% vs 21.69% for EAPR. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SEPU charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.

Performance

SEPU vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF (SEPU) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPU achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 12.29% return.

SEPU

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 6.96%
• 6M: 6.75%
• 1Y: 19.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAPR

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 6M: 12.37%
• 1Y: 21.69%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEPU vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SEPU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF	6.96%	12.32%	3.08%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	12.29%	14.80%	-1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SEPU and EAPR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2024	0.55

The correlation between SEPU and EAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SEPU vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPU

SEPU Risk / Return Rank: 62
SEPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SEPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SEPU Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SEPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SEPU Martin Ratio Rank: 68

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 92
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPU vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF (SEPU) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEPU	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.64	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	4.18	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.73	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	5.58	-2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.02	31.01	-18.99

SEPU vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPU Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPU and EAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEPU vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPU drawdown since its inception was -11.76%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPU and EAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEPU	EAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.76%	-17.65%	+5.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.23%	-3.90%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	0.00%	-1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-4.04%	+2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	0.70%	+0.92%

Volatility

SEPU vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Sep ETF (SEPU) is 4.28%, while Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that SEPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEPU	EAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.28%	4.70%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.75%	7.58%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.08%	8.25%	+1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.06%	10.26%	+0.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.06%	10.15%	+0.91%

SEPU vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEPU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEPU vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEPU nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEPU and EAPR in my portfolio?

SEPU and EAPR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEPU or EAPR?

EAPR has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to SEPU (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEPU dropped -11.76% vs EAPR's -17.65%.

Which ETF is better, SEPU or EAPR?

On 1-year performance, EAPR leads with 21.69% vs 19.41% for SEPU. On fees, SEPU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SEPU has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEPU or EAPR?

Over the 1-year period, EAPR has performed better with a 21.69% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEPU or EAPR?

SEPU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEPU or EAPR?

SEPU and EAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SEPU and EAPR?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SEPU and 0.89% for EAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.