PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEPT vs. APRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEPT vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SEPT having a 6.46% return and APRW slightly lower at 6.38%.


SEPT

1D
0.16%
1M
1.92%
YTD
6.46%
6M
6.94%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRW

1D
0.11%
1M
1.21%
YTD
6.38%
6M
7.12%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEPT vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SEPT
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF
6.46%14.95%16.43%4.86%
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
6.38%6.18%11.25%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SEPT and APRW is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2023

0.86

The correlation between SEPT and APRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEPT vs. APRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEPT
APRW

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SEPT
36.2%
APRW
36.2%

Financial Services

SEPT
11.9%
APRW
11.9%

Communication Services

SEPT
10.9%
APRW
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SEPT
10.1%
APRW
10.1%

Healthcare

SEPT
8.4%
APRW
8.4%

Industrials

SEPT
8.1%
APRW
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SEPT
4.9%
APRW
4.9%

Energy

SEPT
3.5%
APRW
3.5%

Utilities

SEPT
2.3%
APRW
2.3%

Real Estate

SEPT
1.9%
APRW
1.9%

Basic Materials

SEPT
1.8%
APRW
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEPT vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPT
SEPT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SEPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

APRW
APRW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPT vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEPTAPRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

2.24

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

17.00

-13.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.68

87.02

-68.34

SEPT vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is lower than the APRW Sharpe Ratio of 4.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPT and APRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEPTAPRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

4.88

-2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

1.15

+0.45

Drawdowns

SEPT vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPT drawdown since its inception was -12.83%, which is greater than APRW's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPT and APRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEPTAPRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-9.61%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-0.75%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-1.12%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.15%

+0.91%

Volatility

SEPT vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) at 0.59%. This indicates that SEPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEPTAPRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.59%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.61%

1.84%

+3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.48%

2.62%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.86%

6.72%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.86%

6.41%

+3.45%

SEPT vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SEPT and APRW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

SEPT vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEPT nor APRW has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.67%
SEPT
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEPT and APRW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEPT has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to APRW (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEPT dropped -12.83% vs APRW's -9.61%.

On 1-year performance, SEPT leads with 19.73% vs 12.72% for APRW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, APRW has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEPT has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEPT and APRW have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

SEPT and APRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SEPT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while APRW is Options Trading.

APRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.88 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEPT and APRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer