SEPP vs. FBUF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SEPP (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SEPP returned 17.87% vs 19.61% for FBUF. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEPP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

SEPP vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September (SEPP) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPP achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly higher than FBUF's 5.32% return.

SEPP

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 5.73%
• 6M: 6.43%
• 1Y: 17.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBUF

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEPP vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SEPP PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September	5.73%	14.06%	6.79%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	5.32%	14.01%	9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SEPP and FBUF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2024	0.90

The correlation between SEPP and FBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SEPP vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPP

SEPP Risk / Return Rank: 84
SEPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
SEPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SEPP Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SEPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SEPP Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 79
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPP vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September (SEPP) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEPP	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.63	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	3.55	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.53	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	3.51	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.63	15.68	+3.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEPP vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPP Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPP and FBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEPP	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	2.63	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.42	1.47	-0.05

Drawdowns

SEPP vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPP drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPP and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEPP	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.75%	-11.09%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.74%	-5.61%	+0.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.22%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-1.38%	+0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	1.25%	-0.34%

Volatility

SEPP vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September (SEPP) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) at 1.11%. This indicates that SEPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEPP	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	1.11%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.21%	5.37%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.79%	7.49%	-0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.32%	9.55%	-0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.32%	9.55%	-0.23%

SEPP vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEPP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEPP vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

SEPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.63%	0.64%	0.54%
SEPP PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEPP and FBUF in my portfolio?

SEPP and FBUF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEPP or FBUF?

SEPP has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to FBUF (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEPP dropped -11.75% vs FBUF's -11.09%.

Which ETF is better, SEPP or FBUF?

On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 19.61% vs 17.87% for SEPP. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, FBUF has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEPP or FBUF?

Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 19.61% return vs 17.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEPP or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEPP or FBUF?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for SEPP.

What is the main difference between SEPP and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SEPP and 0.48% for FBUF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.