SEMRX vs. FULBX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SEMRX (Semper Short Duration Fund) and FULBX (Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, SEMRX returned 3.41%/yr vs 2.45%/yr for FULBX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEMRX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for FULBX.

Performance

SEMRX vs. FULBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Semper Short Duration Fund (SEMRX) and Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMRX achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly higher than FULBX's 1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMRX has outperformed FULBX with an annualized return of 3.41%, while FULBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.

SEMRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 6M: 2.65%
• 1Y: 5.84%
• 3Y*: 7.34%
• 5Y*: 4.80%
• 10Y*: 3.41%

FULBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.29%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 5.06%
• 5Y*: 3.12%
• 10Y*: 2.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMRX vs. FULBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SEMRX Semper Short Duration Fund	2.15%	6.47%	8.21%	8.76%	-1.69%	1.93%	-1.19%	3.48%	2.11%	2.74%
FULBX Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund	1.29%	5.50%	5.35%	5.15%	-1.31%	0.02%	2.29%	3.32%	1.24%	1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMRX and FULBX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.32

The correlation between SEMRX and FULBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SEMRX vs. FULBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMRX

SEMRX Risk / Return Rank: 98
SEMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SEMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SEMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SEMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SEMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FULBX

FULBX Risk / Return Rank: 98
FULBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FULBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FULBX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FULBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FULBX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMRX vs. FULBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Semper Short Duration Fund (SEMRX) and Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEMRX	FULBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.15	2.97	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.69	7.99	+2.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.09	2.48	+0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.22	8.82	+2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	46.39	40.67	+5.71

SEMRX vs. FULBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is comparable to the FULBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMRX and FULBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEMRX vs. FULBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMRX drawdown since its inception was -13.09%, which is greater than FULBX's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMRX and FULBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEMRX	FULBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.09%	-5.43%	-7.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.52%	-0.54%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.63%	-0.54%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.05%	-2.60%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.09%	-4.67%	-8.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.11%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.62%	-0.80%	+0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	0.12%	+0.01%

Volatility

SEMRX vs. FULBX - Volatility Comparison

Semper Short Duration Fund (SEMRX) has a higher volatility of 0.51% compared to Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX) at 0.47%. This indicates that SEMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FULBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEMRX	FULBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.51%	0.47%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.28%	1.17%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87%	1.59%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.84%	1.38%	+0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.31%	1.26%	+1.05%

SEMRX vs. FULBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMRX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FULBX's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEMRX vs. FULBX - Dividend Comparison

SEMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than FULBX's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FULBX Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund	4.60%	4.79%	3.99%	2.67%	1.00%	0.56%	1.49%	2.16%	1.90%	1.25%	0.84%	0.64%
SEMRX Semper Short Duration Fund	5.67%	5.94%	6.13%	6.05%	3.22%	1.71%	1.95%	2.90%	2.70%	2.20%	3.03%	2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEMRX and FULBX in my portfolio?

SEMRX and FULBX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEMRX or FULBX?

SEMRX has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to FULBX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMRX dropped -13.09% vs FULBX's -5.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.