SEMPX vs. SCFZX
SEMPX (Semper MBS Total Return Fund) and SCFZX (PGIM Securitized Credit Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, SEMPX returned 4.34%/yr vs 5.28%/yr for SCFZX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEMPX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SCFZX.
Performance
SEMPX vs. SCFZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEMPX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than SCFZX's 2.28% return.
SEMPX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 6.21%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- 3.55%
SCFZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- —
SEMPX vs. SCFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMPX Semper MBS Total Return Fund | 0.90% | 8.57% | 12.84% | 12.51% | -13.26% | 6.70% | -7.09% | 1.50% |
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 2.28% | 5.75% | 9.41% | 8.67% | -0.84% | 5.27% | -0.33% | 1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEMPX and SCFZX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEMPX vs. SCFZX — Risk / Return Rank
SEMPX
SCFZX
SEMPX vs. SCFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Semper MBS Total Return Fund (SEMPX) and PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEMPX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 6.28 | -4.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 20.02 | -16.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | 69.95 | -59.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEMPX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 4.09 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.40 | 2.78 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 1.37 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
SEMPX vs. SCFZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEMPX drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, which is greater than SCFZX's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMPX and SCFZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEMPX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.02% | -17.20% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.04% | -0.31% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.04% | -0.93% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.67% | -4.13% | -10.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | 0.00% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -1.06% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.09% | +0.54% |
Volatility
SEMPX vs. SCFZX - Volatility Comparison
Semper MBS Total Return Fund (SEMPX) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) at 0.42%. This indicates that SEMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEMPX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 0.42% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | 1.03% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78% | 1.50% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.12% | 1.91% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 3.34% | +0.58% |
SEMPX vs. SCFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEMPX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFZX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEMPX vs. SCFZX - Dividend Comparison
SEMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than SCFZX's 5.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 5.08% | 5.25% | 6.55% | 5.58% | 4.97% | 2.56% | 3.08% | 2.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEMPX Semper MBS Total Return Fund | 5.71% | 5.83% | 6.66% | 8.75% | 6.15% | 2.97% | 4.07% | 4.72% | 5.65% | 5.00% | 5.94% | 5.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEMPX and SCFZX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEMPX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to SCFZX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMPX dropped -25.02% vs SCFZX's -17.20%.
SCFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEMPX and SCFZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer