SEMPX vs. PADZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Semper MBS Total Return Fund (SEMPX) and PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX).
SEMPX is managed by Semper. It was launched on Jul 21, 2013. PADZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011.
Performance
SEMPX vs. PADZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEMPX vs. PADZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMPX Semper MBS Total Return Fund | -0.02% | 8.57% | 12.96% | 12.51% | -13.26% | 6.70% | -7.09% | 4.52% | 3.75% | 5.93% |
PADZX PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund | 0.36% | 5.10% | 7.48% | 6.11% | -1.55% | 1.87% | 0.59% | 11.10% | 0.71% | 6.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEMPX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than PADZX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMPX has underperformed PADZX with an annualized return of 3.57%, while PADZX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.26% annualized return.
SEMPX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 6.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 3.57%
PADZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEMPX vs. PADZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEMPX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PADZX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SEMPX vs. PADZX — Risk / Return Rank
SEMPX
PADZX
SEMPX vs. PADZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Semper MBS Total Return Fund (SEMPX) and PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEMPX | PADZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 2.52 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.91 | 5.56 | -1.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 2.25 | -0.76 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 4.98 | -1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.61 | 18.39 | -6.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEMPX | PADZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.52 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.50 | 1.89 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 1.37 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 1.17 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEMPX and PADZX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SEMPX vs. PADZX - Dividend Comparison
SEMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than PADZX's 4.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMPX Semper MBS Total Return Fund | 5.30% | 5.83% | 6.77% | 8.75% | 6.15% | 2.97% | 4.07% | 4.72% | 5.65% | 5.00% | 5.94% | 5.10% |
PADZX PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund | 4.68% | 5.07% | 5.18% | 4.09% | 2.89% | 2.40% | 3.41% | 10.79% | 5.02% | 2.75% | 2.36% | 2.38% |
Drawdowns
SEMPX vs. PADZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEMPX drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, which is greater than PADZX's maximum drawdown of -17.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMPX and PADZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEMPX | PADZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.02% | -17.99% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.04% | -0.87% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.67% | -4.05% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.02% | -17.99% | -7.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -0.65% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -0.96% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.27% | +0.31% |
Volatility
SEMPX vs. PADZX - Volatility Comparison
Semper MBS Total Return Fund (SEMPX) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX) at 0.35%. This indicates that SEMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEMPX | PADZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 0.35% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.88% | 1.16% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85% | 1.80% | +1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 2.06% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 3.13% | +0.77% |