SEMNX vs. DEMAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX).
SEMNX is managed by Hartford. DEMAX is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on Jun 10, 1996.
Performance
SEMNX vs. DEMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEMNX vs. DEMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMNX Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I | 3.88% | 40.36% | 7.56% | 8.80% | -22.30% | -5.11% | 23.58% | 22.12% | -15.57% | 40.87% |
DEMAX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 14.10% | 86.33% | 6.25% | 17.34% | -28.85% | -2.32% | 25.54% | 24.05% | -17.32% | 41.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEMNX achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly lower than DEMAX's 14.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMNX has underperformed DEMAX with an annualized return of 9.33%, while DEMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.18% annualized return.
SEMNX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- YTD
- 3.88%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 41.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
DEMAX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -17.26%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 42.67%
- 1Y
- 102.96%
- 3Y*
- 35.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEMNX vs. DEMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEMNX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMAX's 1.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SEMNX vs. DEMAX — Risk / Return Rank
SEMNX
DEMAX
SEMNX vs. DEMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEMNX | DEMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 3.21 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 3.36 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.52 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 4.81 | -2.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.39 | 19.04 | -7.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEMNX | DEMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 3.21 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.52 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.65 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.43 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEMNX and DEMAX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SEMNX vs. DEMAX - Dividend Comparison
SEMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than DEMAX's 16.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMNX Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I | 1.52% | 1.58% | 1.16% | 1.33% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 0.77% | 2.17% | 1.22% | 0.82% | 0.94% | 0.94% |
DEMAX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 16.67% | 19.03% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 1.60% | 3.16% | 0.56% | 0.57% | 0.34% | 1.59% | 0.70% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
SEMNX vs. DEMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEMNX drawdown since its inception was -65.10%, roughly equal to the maximum DEMAX drawdown of -63.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMNX and DEMAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEMNX | DEMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.10% | -63.23% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -20.32% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.74% | -44.15% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | -46.51% | +4.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.22% | -18.96% | +6.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.39% | -18.84% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 5.14% | -1.52% |
Volatility
SEMNX vs. DEMAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) is 10.25%, while Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX) has a volatility of 19.20%. This indicates that SEMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEMNX | DEMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | 19.20% | -8.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 28.39% | -13.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.54% | 33.29% | -13.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 23.12% | -5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 21.94% | -3.57% |