SEMNX vs. CNWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX).
SEMNX is managed by Hartford. CNWIX is managed by Calamos.
Performance
SEMNX vs. CNWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEMNX vs. CNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMNX Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I | 3.88% | 40.36% | 7.56% | 8.80% | -22.30% | -5.11% | 23.58% | 22.12% | -15.57% | 40.87% |
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 7.40% | 19.29% | 14.99% | 6.60% | -24.35% | -4.70% | 54.23% | 20.76% | -17.74% | 36.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEMNX achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly lower than CNWIX's 7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMNX has outperformed CNWIX with an annualized return of 9.33%, while CNWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.63% annualized return.
SEMNX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- YTD
- 3.88%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 41.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
CNWIX
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- -13.56%
- YTD
- 7.40%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 30.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEMNX vs. CNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEMNX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than CNWIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SEMNX vs. CNWIX — Risk / Return Rank
SEMNX
CNWIX
SEMNX vs. CNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEMNX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 1.53 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 1.96 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.29 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 1.87 | +0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.39 | 7.15 | +4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEMNX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 1.53 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.13 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.36 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.27 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEMNX and CNWIX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SEMNX vs. CNWIX - Dividend Comparison
SEMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than CNWIX's 0.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMNX Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I | 1.52% | 1.58% | 1.16% | 1.33% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 0.77% | 2.17% | 1.22% | 0.82% | 0.94% | 0.94% |
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.97% | 2.79% | 2.01% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
SEMNX vs. CNWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEMNX drawdown since its inception was -65.10%, which is greater than CNWIX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMNX and CNWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEMNX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.10% | -43.57% | -21.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -16.28% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.74% | -37.47% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | -43.57% | +1.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.22% | -14.20% | +1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.39% | -16.56% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 4.26% | -0.64% |
Volatility
SEMNX vs. CNWIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) is 10.25%, while Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that SEMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEMNX | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | 11.15% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 17.00% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.54% | 20.27% | -0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 17.56% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 24.08% | -5.71% |