PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SELD.DE vs. EXSB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SELD.DE vs. EXSB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 UCITS ETF Dist (SELD.DE) and iShares DivDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXSB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SELD.DE achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than EXSB.DE's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, SELD.DE has outperformed EXSB.DE with an annualized return of 9.59%, while EXSB.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.59% annualized return.


SELD.DE

1D
0.52%
1M
4.00%
YTD
14.08%
6M
19.29%
1Y
32.34%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
9.59%

EXSB.DE

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
1.54%
6M
3.75%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
5.53%
10Y*
7.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SELD.DE vs. EXSB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SELD.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 UCITS ETF Dist
14.08%44.46%5.76%3.90%-10.09%24.12%-9.44%27.63%-4.88%5.07%
EXSB.DE
iShares DivDAX UCITS ETF (DE)
1.54%21.72%4.26%17.02%-11.05%13.58%2.20%23.19%-16.62%13.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SELD.DE and EXSB.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2007

0.74

The correlation between SELD.DE and EXSB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SELD.DE vs. EXSB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SELD.DE
SELD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SELD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SELD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SELD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SELD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SELD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EXSB.DE
EXSB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EXSB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXSB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXSB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
EXSB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXSB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SELD.DE vs. EXSB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 UCITS ETF Dist (SELD.DE) and iShares DivDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXSB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SELD.DEEXSB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.11

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

0.82

+3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.20

2.26

+13.94

SELD.DE vs. EXSB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SELD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the EXSB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SELD.DE and EXSB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SELD.DEEXSB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

0.55

+2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.32

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.40

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.34

-0.17

Drawdowns

SELD.DE vs. EXSB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SELD.DE drawdown since its inception was -70.30%, which is greater than EXSB.DE's maximum drawdown of -60.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SELD.DE and EXSB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SELD.DEEXSB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.30%

-60.17%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-9.88%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.13%

-15.89%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.02%

-25.49%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.65%

-41.68%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-5.13%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.32%

-12.25%

-13.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

3.58%

-1.59%

Volatility

SELD.DE vs. EXSB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 UCITS ETF Dist (SELD.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to iShares DivDAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXSB.DE) at 3.57%. This indicates that SELD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXSB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SELD.DEEXSB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

3.57%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

11.51%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

14.64%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

16.99%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

18.65%

-1.23%

SELD.DE vs. EXSB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SELD.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EXSB.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

SELD.DE vs. EXSB.DE - Dividend Comparison

SELD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than EXSB.DE's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXSB.DE
iShares DivDAX UCITS ETF (DE)
3.06%3.11%3.50%4.55%3.19%2.17%2.19%2.36%2.77%1.65%2.53%3.23%
SELD.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30 UCITS ETF Dist
5.68%6.48%6.46%0.00%7.70%4.52%5.09%5.34%5.60%4.75%5.20%5.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SELD.DE and EXSB.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SELD.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SELD.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EXSB.DE.

SELD.DE tracks STOXX® Europe Select Dividend 30, while EXSB.DE tracks DivDAX®. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SELD.DE and 0.31% for EXSB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SELD.DE and EXSB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer