PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SELCX vs. VRGWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SELCX vs. VRGWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Growth Fund (SELCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SELCX achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than VRGWX's 5.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SELCX has underperformed VRGWX with an annualized return of 17.35%, while VRGWX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.55% annualized return.


SELCX

1D
0.46%
1M
2.47%
6M
9.73%
YTD
11.73%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
17.35%

VRGWX

1D
0.50%
1M
2.01%
6M
4.17%
YTD
5.06%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
13.89%
10Y*
18.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SELCX vs. VRGWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SELCX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Growth Fund
11.73%17.81%32.24%39.18%-28.99%25.73%34.01%33.21%-0.93%28.40%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
5.06%18.32%33.25%42.65%-29.18%32.42%38.38%36.30%-1.59%30.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SELCX and VRGWX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.98

The correlation between SELCX and VRGWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SELCX vs. VRGWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SELCX
SELCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SELCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SELCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SELCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SELCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SELCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VRGWX
VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SELCX vs. VRGWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Growth Fund (SELCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SELCXVRGWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.18

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

1.01

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

3.19

+4.76

SELCX vs. VRGWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SELCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the VRGWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SELCX and VRGWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SELCX vs. VRGWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SELCX drawdown since its inception was -68.55%, which is greater than VRGWX's maximum drawdown of -32.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SELCX and VRGWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SELCXVRGWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.55%

-32.70%

-35.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.32%

-16.19%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.96%

-23.44%

-11.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.96%

-32.70%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.96%

-32.70%

-2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-3.61%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-4.88%

-17.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

5.09%

-2.26%

Volatility

SELCX vs. VRGWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Growth Fund (SELCX) is 5.47%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that SELCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRGWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SELCXVRGWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

6.52%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

13.30%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.34%

16.61%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.54%

21.82%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

21.21%

+2.03%

SELCX vs. VRGWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SELCX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than VRGWX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SELCX vs. VRGWX - Dividend Comparison

SELCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.77%, more than VRGWX's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SELCX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Growth Fund
20.77%23.21%22.18%16.86%8.18%13.35%9.37%5.94%14.76%8.57%0.11%19.07%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.46%0.35%0.56%0.71%0.99%4.18%0.77%1.03%1.22%1.22%1.52%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SELCX and VRGWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VRGWX has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to SELCX (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SELCX dropped -68.55% vs VRGWX's -32.70%.

SELCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SELCX and VRGWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer