SEIAX vs. IPBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about SEI Institutional Investments Trust Multi-Asset Real Return Fund (SEIAX) and Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX).
SEIAX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Jul 28, 2011. IPBAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Feb 27, 2003.
Performance
SEIAX vs. IPBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEIAX vs. IPBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Multi-Asset Real Return Fund | 9.31% | 8.50% | 4.74% | -1.01% | 9.20% | 11.41% | -0.51% | 6.33% | -2.93% | -1.12% |
IPBAX Allspring Real Return Fund | 11.78% | 10.37% | 8.12% | 5.35% | -10.75% | 7.74% | 8.03% | 9.87% | -4.02% | 4.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEIAX achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly lower than IPBAX's 11.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SEIAX has underperformed IPBAX with an annualized return of 4.66%, while IPBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.92% annualized return.
SEIAX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- 11.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
IPBAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 23.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEIAX vs. IPBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEIAX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than IPBAX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SEIAX vs. IPBAX — Risk / Return Rank
SEIAX
IPBAX
SEIAX vs. IPBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Multi-Asset Real Return Fund (SEIAX) and Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEIAX | IPBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 2.91 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | 3.98 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.53 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 6.12 | -2.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.09 | 22.57 | -11.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEIAX | IPBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.91 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.38 | 0.89 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.83 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.70 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEIAX and IPBAX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SEIAX vs. IPBAX - Dividend Comparison
SEIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than IPBAX's 2.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Multi-Asset Real Return Fund | 2.69% | 2.94% | 5.16% | 3.77% | 13.78% | 10.42% | 2.34% | 2.13% | 3.63% | 1.57% | 1.73% | 1.01% |
IPBAX Allspring Real Return Fund | 2.33% | 2.58% | 2.26% | 3.71% | 5.07% | 3.84% | 1.26% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.77% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
SEIAX vs. IPBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, which is greater than IPBAX's maximum drawdown of -15.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIAX and IPBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEIAX | IPBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.97% | -15.13% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.95% | -3.84% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.67% | -13.94% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.20% | -13.94% | +0.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.38% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -3.15% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 1.04% | +0.09% |
Volatility
SEIAX vs. IPBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Multi-Asset Real Return Fund (SEIAX) is 2.09%, while Allspring Real Return Fund (IPBAX) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that SEIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEIAX | IPBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 3.22% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.92% | 6.48% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.24% | 8.01% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.53% | 7.12% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.18% | 5.93% | -0.75% |