PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIAX vs. FSTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIAX vs. FSTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A (SEIAX) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIAX achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly higher than FSTZX's 1.48% return.


SEIAX

1D
-0.64%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
5.53%
6M
6.06%
1Y
8.34%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
3.91%

FSTZX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.59%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIAX vs. FSTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SEIAX
SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A
5.53%8.50%4.74%-1.01%9.20%2.30%
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
1.48%5.99%4.87%4.67%-2.83%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIAX and FSTZX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2021

0.46

The correlation between SEIAX and FSTZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIAX vs. FSTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIAX
SEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTZX
FSTZX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FSTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIAX vs. FSTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A (SEIAX) and Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEIAXFSTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.50

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

5.63

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

19.94

-10.52

SEIAX vs. FSTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the FSTZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIAX and FSTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEIAX vs. FSTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, which is greater than FSTZX's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIAX and FSTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIAXFSTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.97%

-5.30%

-15.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.17%

-0.70%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.17%

-1.03%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.17%

-0.60%

-3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-1.08%

-6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.20%

+0.69%

Volatility

SEIAX vs. FSTZX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A (SEIAX) has a higher volatility of 1.67% compared to Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) at 0.71%. This indicates that SEIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIAXFSTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

0.71%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.82%

1.24%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.45%

1.71%

+3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

2.79%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

2.79%

+2.45%

SEIAX vs. FSTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIAX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTZX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SEIAX vs. FSTZX - Dividend Comparison

SEIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than FSTZX's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.66%4.02%2.78%2.54%5.25%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEIAX
SEI Multi-Asset Real Return Fund Class A
2.78%2.94%5.16%3.77%13.78%10.42%2.34%2.13%3.63%1.57%1.73%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEIAX and FSTZX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEIAX has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to FSTZX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIAX dropped -20.97% vs FSTZX's -5.30%.

FSTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIAX and FSTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer