SEHAX vs. TANDX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SEHAX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund) and TANDX (Castle Tandem Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SEHAX returned 13.19%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for TANDX. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SEHAX charges 0.32%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for TANDX.

Performance

SEHAX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund (SEHAX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEHAX achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -7.03% return.

SEHAX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 2.22%
• 6M: 10.42%
• YTD: 13.78%
• 1Y: 25.99%
• 3Y*: 20.78%
• 5Y*: 13.19%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.77%

TANDX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 2.80%
• 6M: -6.04%
• YTD: -7.03%
• 1Y: -7.70%
• 3Y*: 1.85%
• 5Y*: 2.24%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SEHAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SEHAX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SEHAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund	13.78%	17.99%	24.97%	21.99%	-15.84%	32.78%	13.16%	12.40%
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund	-7.03%	3.67%	7.66%	8.42%	-7.87%	19.03%	13.39%	12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SEHAX and TANDX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between SEHAX and TANDX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SEHAX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEHAX

SEHAX Risk / Return Rank: 83
SEHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
SEHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
SEHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SEHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SEHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

TANDX

TANDX Risk / Return Rank: 1
TANDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
TANDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
TANDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
TANDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TANDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEHAX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund (SEHAX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEHAX	TANDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	-0.78	+2.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	-1.06	+3.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	0.88	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	-0.50	+3.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.54	-0.95	+14.48

SEHAX vs. TANDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the TANDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEHAX and TANDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEHAX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEHAX drawdown since its inception was -35.77%, smaller than the maximum TANDX drawdown of -93.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEHAX and TANDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEHAX	TANDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.77%	-93.98%	+58.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.74%	-16.88%	+9.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.69%	-93.98%	+76.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.77%	-93.98%	+58.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-93.50%	+93.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.88%	-21.88%	+13.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	8.82%	-7.03%

Volatility

SEHAX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund (SEHAX) is 2.83%, while Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that SEHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEHAX	TANDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	4.65%	-1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.27%	8.74%	+0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.03%	10.67%	+1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.06%	595.81%	-574.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.59%	491.02%	-469.43%

SEHAX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEHAX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEHAX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison

SEHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than TANDX's 6.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SEHAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Fund	4.91%	5.52%	7.85%	1.15%	12.75%	23.76%	1.69%	1.97%	1.24%
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund	6.64%	6.17%	3.71%	2.10%	1.48%	4.57%	0.33%	0.37%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEHAX and TANDX in my portfolio?

SEHAX and TANDX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEHAX or TANDX?

TANDX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to SEHAX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEHAX dropped -35.77% vs TANDX's -93.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.