SEEM vs. LEND
SEEM (SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and LEND (SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by SEI, while LEND is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by SEI. Both are actively managed. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SEEM charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LEND.
Performance
SEEM vs. LEND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SEEM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 21.89%
- 1Y
- 41.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.48%
LEND
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.84M | $3.67M | $2.39M | |
| $2.35M | $2.55M | $2.06M |
SEEM vs. LEND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SEEM SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 0.33% |
LEND SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEEM and LEND is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEEM vs. LEND — Risk / Return Rank
SEEM
LEND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEEM vs. LEND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) and SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF (LEND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEEM | LEND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.13 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEEM vs. LEND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEEM drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than LEND's maximum drawdown of -1.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEEM and LEND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEEM | LEND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -1.00% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.06% | -0.74% | -8.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -0.32% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | — | — |
Volatility
SEEM vs. LEND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEEM | LEND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.71% | 3.33% | +20.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 3.33% | +18.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 3.33% | +18.26% |
SEEM vs. LEND - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than LEND's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEEM vs. LEND - Dividend Comparison
SEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than LEND's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LEND SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEEM SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.73% | 3.31% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEEM and LEND have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEEM is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEEM is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEND.
SEEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.98% for LEND.
SEEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LEND is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEEM and 0.65% for LEND.
Find the right allocation for SEEM and LEND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer