PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEEGX vs. WASMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEEGX vs. WASMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) and Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund (WASMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEEGX achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly higher than WASMX's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SEEGX has outperformed WASMX with an annualized return of 19.28%, while WASMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.69% annualized return.


SEEGX

1D
-3.78%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
3.01%
6M
0.98%
1Y
15.13%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
19.28%

WASMX

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEEGX vs. WASMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEEGX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund
3.01%14.08%35.14%34.62%-25.40%18.17%56.02%39.13%0.50%38.03%
WASMX
Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund
1.27%0.31%10.39%16.40%-14.57%30.04%9.22%32.50%-5.60%14.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SEEGX and WASMX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between SEEGX and WASMX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEEGX vs. WASMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEEGX
SEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

WASMX
WASMX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
WASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
WASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
WASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEEGX vs. WASMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) and Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund (WASMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEEGXWASMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.07

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

0.39

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

1.09

+1.65

SEEGX vs. WASMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the WASMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEEGX and WASMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEEGXWASMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.33

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.26

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.52

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.59

-0.02

Drawdowns

SEEGX vs. WASMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEEGX drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than WASMX's maximum drawdown of -37.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEEGX and WASMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEEGXWASMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.09%

-37.74%

-24.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.82%

-11.38%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.50%

-20.52%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.23%

-23.07%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.85%

-37.74%

+5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.49%

-6.31%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.90%

-5.22%

-11.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

4.08%

+1.82%

Volatility

SEEGX vs. WASMX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund (WASMX) at 2.86%. This indicates that SEEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WASMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEEGXWASMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

2.86%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

9.11%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

13.55%

+2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

17.15%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.63%

18.60%

+3.03%

SEEGX vs. WASMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEEGX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than WASMX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEEGX vs. WASMX - Dividend Comparison

SEEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.11%, more than WASMX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEEGX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund
11.11%11.44%2.00%0.12%3.42%14.92%5.27%12.85%15.97%14.79%9.88%4.49%
WASMX
Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund
1.63%1.65%1.67%0.52%4.90%4.75%1.86%9.96%4.40%0.52%5.41%7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEEGX and WASMX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEEGX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to WASMX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEEGX dropped -62.09% vs WASMX's -37.74%.

SEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEEGX and WASMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer