PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEDM.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEDM.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SEDM.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEDM.L is traded in USD, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SEDM.L having a 18.00% return and IITU.L slightly lower at 17.45%.


SEDM.L

1D
-0.77%
1M
-7.30%
6M
12.55%
YTD
18.00%
1Y
33.61%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*

IITU.L

1D
-0.41%
1M
-2.54%
6M
20.12%
YTD
17.45%
1Y
32.12%
3Y*
29.51%
5Y*
21.16%
10Y*
25.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEDM.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
18.00%32.84%7.40%10.53%-20.48%-1.52%19.90%16.95%1.21%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
17.45%23.07%38.50%58.65%-29.11%34.44%42.58%49.99%-11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SEDM.L and IITU.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018

0.60

The correlation between SEDM.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEDM.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEDM.L
SEDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SEDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEDM.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SEDM.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEDM.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

1.90

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

5.17

+2.87

SEDM.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEDM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEDM.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEDM.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEDM.L drawdown since its inception was -38.83%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -43.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEDM.L and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEDM.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.83%

-43.85%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-16.80%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.22%

-26.42%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.83%

-34.22%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-7.53%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.85%

-10.59%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

6.20%

-2.03%

Volatility

SEDM.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SEDM.L) has a higher volatility of 8.85% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) at 7.45%. This indicates that SEDM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEDM.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.85%

7.45%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.60%

17.21%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.74%

21.89%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

27.39%

-8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

24.22%

-4.03%

SEDM.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEDM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SEDM.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

SEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.71%1.96%2.37%2.33%2.56%1.83%1.51%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEDM.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SEDM.L.

SEDM.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SEDM.L tracks iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SEDM.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEDM.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer