PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEDM.L vs. FLXK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEDM.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SEDM.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEDM.L achieves a 18.00% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 75.46% return.


SEDM.L

1D
-0.77%
1M
-7.30%
6M
12.55%
YTD
18.00%
1Y
33.61%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*

FLXK.L

1D
-1.68%
1M
-19.56%
6M
57.13%
YTD
75.46%
1Y
141.50%
3Y*
39.45%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEDM.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
18.00%32.84%7.40%10.53%-20.48%-1.52%19.90%11.80%
FLXK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
75.46%94.79%-21.63%20.77%-28.01%-6.85%47.31%13.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SEDM.L and FLXK.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.80

The correlation between SEDM.L and FLXK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEDM.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEDM.L
SEDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SEDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXK.L
FLXK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEDM.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SEDM.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEDM.LFLXK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.47

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

5.86

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.04

18.40

-10.36

SEDM.L vs. FLXK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEDM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEDM.L and FLXK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEDM.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEDM.L drawdown since its inception was -38.83%, smaller than the maximum FLXK.L drawdown of -49.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEDM.L and FLXK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEDM.LFLXK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.83%

-49.43%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-24.10%

+10.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.22%

-28.54%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.83%

-47.00%

+12.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-24.10%

+15.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.85%

-20.23%

+7.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

7.70%

-3.53%

Volatility

SEDM.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SEDM.L) is 8.85%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 19.75%. This indicates that SEDM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEDM.LFLXK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.85%

19.75%

-10.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.60%

41.53%

-21.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.74%

45.08%

-23.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

29.63%

-10.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

29.61%

-9.42%

SEDM.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEDM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SEDM.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison

SEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while FLXK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FLXK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.71%1.96%2.37%2.33%2.56%1.83%1.51%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEDM.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SEDM.L.

SEDM.L tracks iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while FLXK.L tracks Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SEDM.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEDM.L and FLXK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer