SECUX vs. FSMAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SECUX (Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund) and FSMAX (Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SECUX returned 11.33%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for FSMAX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SECUX charges 1.42%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSMAX.

Performance

SECUX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECUX achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly higher than FSMAX's 14.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SECUX has underperformed FSMAX with an annualized return of 11.33%, while FSMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.

SECUX

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 5.29%
• YTD: 16.16%
• 6M: 16.31%
• 1Y: 18.16%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 6.06%
• 10Y*: 11.33%

FSMAX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 5.80%
• YTD: 14.89%
• 6M: 13.61%
• 1Y: 30.08%
• 3Y*: 20.13%
• 5Y*: 6.91%
• 10Y*: 12.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECUX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund	16.16%	1.86%	14.29%	26.43%	-28.33%	13.39%	31.95%	32.44%	-7.76%	24.15%
FSMAX Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund	14.89%	11.40%	16.99%	25.36%	-26.44%	12.41%	32.28%	28.01%	-9.44%	18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SECUX and FSMAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011	0.94

The correlation between SECUX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SECUX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECUX

SECUX Risk / Return Rank: 24
SECUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
SECUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SECUX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SECUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SECUX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FSMAX

FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECUX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SECUX	FSMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.87	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	2.60	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.32	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	3.12	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.20	11.05	-3.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SECUX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECUX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SECUX	FSMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	1.87	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.31	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.40	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.46	-0.20

Drawdowns

SECUX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECUX drawdown since its inception was -71.68%, which is greater than FSMAX's maximum drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECUX and FSMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SECUX	FSMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.68%	-50.55%	-21.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	-10.26%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-26.82%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.80%	-36.31%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.56%	-50.55%	+11.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.41%	-12.17%	-6.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	2.90%	-0.20%

Volatility

SECUX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) is 4.42%, while Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that SECUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SECUX	FSMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	4.70%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.56%	12.46%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.83%	17.17%	-1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.43%	22.33%	-0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.19%	30.24%	-9.05%

SECUX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECUX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

SECUX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSMAX Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund	0.50%	0.57%	0.48%	1.17%	1.90%	7.49%	2.14%	4.30%	6.09%	5.44%	4.85%	6.34%
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.31%	41.48%	6.54%	14.34%	2.18%	27.68%	12.89%	0.59%	14.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SECUX and FSMAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, SECUX and FSMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SECUX or FSMAX?

FSMAX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to SECUX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECUX dropped -71.68% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.