SECUX vs. FAMVX
SECUX (Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund) and FAMVX (FAM Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SECUX returned 10.73%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for FAMVX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SECUX charges 1.42%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for FAMVX.
Performance
SECUX vs. FAMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECUX achieves a 13.34% return, which is significantly higher than FAMVX's 6.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SECUX having a 10.73% annualized return and FAMVX not far behind at 10.22%.
SECUX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 1Y
- 14.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
FAMVX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 7.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
SECUX vs. FAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 13.34% | 1.86% | 14.29% | 26.43% | -28.33% | 13.39% | 31.95% | 32.44% | -7.76% | 24.15% |
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 6.60% | 4.90% | 15.51% | 16.09% | -14.06% | 25.65% | 6.81% | 30.31% | -6.15% | 17.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SECUX and FAMVX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 1995 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SECUX and FAMVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SECUX vs. FAMVX — Risk / Return Rank
SECUX
FAMVX
SECUX vs. FAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SECUX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.10 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 0.82 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 2.47 | +2.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SECUX vs. FAMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECUX drawdown since its inception was -71.68%, which is greater than FAMVX's maximum drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECUX and FAMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECUX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.68% | -51.12% | -20.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -9.47% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | -16.74% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.80% | -22.77% | -15.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.56% | -37.73% | -0.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -1.47% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -6.41% | -11.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 3.14% | -0.35% |
Volatility
SECUX vs. FAMVX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) at 3.15%. This indicates that SECUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SECUX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 3.15% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.69% | 10.58% | +3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.91% | 13.82% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 17.15% | +4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 18.17% | +3.02% |
SECUX vs. FAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECUX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMVX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SECUX vs. FAMVX - Dividend Comparison
SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 4.60% | 4.90% | 6.28% | 5.01% | 3.67% | 4.99% | 3.69% | 6.80% | 4.09% | 5.06% | 5.21% | 9.06% |
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 41.48% | 6.54% | 14.34% | 2.18% | 27.68% | 12.89% | 0.59% | 14.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SECUX and FAMVX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SECUX has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to FAMVX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECUX dropped -71.68% vs FAMVX's -51.12%.
SECUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SECUX and FAMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer