PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECUX vs. BBMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECUX vs. BBMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund (BBMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECUX achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly higher than BBMIX's 2.86% return.


SECUX

1D
1.03%
1M
5.29%
YTD
16.16%
6M
16.31%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
11.33%

BBMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.86%
6M
2.86%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECUX vs. BBMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SECUX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund
16.16%1.86%14.29%26.43%-28.33%9.04%
BBMIX
BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund
2.86%-6.45%11.41%26.01%-24.76%13.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SECUX and BBMIX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between SECUX and BBMIX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECUX vs. BBMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECUX
SECUX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SECUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SECUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BBMIX
BBMIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BBMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECUX vs. BBMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund (BBMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SECUXBBMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

0.24

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

0.43

+1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.07

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

0.32

+1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.20

0.50

+6.70

SECUX vs. BBMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the BBMIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECUX and BBMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SECUXBBMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

0.24

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.16

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.15

+0.11

Drawdowns

SECUX vs. BBMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECUX drawdown since its inception was -71.68%, which is greater than BBMIX's maximum drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECUX and BBMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECUXBBMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.68%

-28.90%

-42.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-8.89%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

-23.79%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.80%

-28.90%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.28%

+11.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-10.51%

-7.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

5.68%

-2.98%

Volatility

SECUX vs. BBMIX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund (BBMIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that SECUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECUXBBMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

0.00%

+4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

6.37%

+6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

11.62%

+4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

19.72%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

19.68%

+1.51%

SECUX vs. BBMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECUX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BBMIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECUX vs. BBMIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither SECUX nor BBMIX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBMIX
BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.32%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SECUX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.31%41.48%6.54%14.34%2.18%27.68%12.89%0.59%14.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SECUX and BBMIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SECUX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to BBMIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECUX dropped -71.68% vs BBMIX's -28.90%.

SECUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECUX and BBMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer