PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECU vs. FTGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECU vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Securitized Income Active ETF (SECU) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SECU

1D
0.22%
1M
0.83%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTGC

1D
-1.65%
1M
-8.90%
YTD
16.89%
6M
15.85%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
6.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECU vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SECU and FTGC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2026

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECU vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECU vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Securitized Income Active ETF (SECU) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SECUFTGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

SECU vs. FTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SECU vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECU drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECU and FTGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECUFTGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-59.47%

+57.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-12.34%

+12.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-27.33%

+26.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

Volatility

SECU vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECUFTGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30%

15.64%

-12.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.30%

15.89%

-12.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.30%

14.72%

-11.42%

SECU vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECU vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison

SECU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than FTGC's 16.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
16.40%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%
SECU
iShares Securitized Income Active ETF
2.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SECU and FTGC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SECU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SECU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 16.40%, compared with 2.09% for SECU.

SECU is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SECU and 0.95% for FTGC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECU and FTGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer