SECIX vs. TILVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SECIX (Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund) and TILVX (TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SECIX returned 9.70%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for TILVX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SECIX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TILVX.

Performance

SECIX vs. TILVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECIX achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than TILVX's 14.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SECIX has underperformed TILVX with an annualized return of 9.70%, while TILVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.10% annualized return.

SECIX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 7.93%
• 6M: 8.05%
• 1Y: 21.73%
• 3Y*: 11.67%
• 5Y*: 7.43%
• 10Y*: 9.70%

TILVX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 14.30%
• 6M: 14.82%
• 1Y: 28.25%
• 3Y*: 18.53%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: 11.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECIX vs. TILVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SECIX Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund	7.93%	13.92%	3.94%	9.03%	-1.58%	27.12%	2.60%	21.44%	-10.05%	15.33%
TILVX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund	14.30%	15.81%	14.26%	11.49%	-7.57%	25.05%	2.90%	26.48%	-8.38%	10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SECIX and TILVX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002	0.96

The correlation between SECIX and TILVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SECIX vs. TILVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECIX

SECIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
SECIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SECIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SECIX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SECIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SECIX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

TILVX

TILVX Risk / Return Rank: 83
TILVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
TILVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
TILVX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
TILVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
TILVX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECIX vs. TILVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SECIX	TILVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.70	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.81	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.49	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	4.30	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.14	18.01	-4.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SECIX vs. TILVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the TILVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECIX and TILVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SECIX	TILVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.70	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.71	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.63	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.48	-0.22

Drawdowns

SECIX vs. TILVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECIX drawdown since its inception was -62.58%, roughly equal to the maximum TILVX drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECIX and TILVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SECIX	TILVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.58%	-60.05%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-6.80%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.37%	-15.58%	-7.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.37%	-19.00%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.54%	-40.15%	+1.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.48%	-8.26%	-8.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	1.62%	+0.10%

Volatility

SECIX vs. TILVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) is 2.53%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that SECIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SECIX	TILVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	3.04%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.30%	8.19%	-0.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.98%	10.84%	-0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.61%	14.82%	+1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.62%	17.66%	+0.96%

SECIX vs. TILVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TILVX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

SECIX vs. TILVX - Dividend Comparison

SECIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.49%, more than TILVX's 5.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SECIX Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund	13.49%	14.56%	3.80%	12.08%	9.42%	6.96%	7.12%	7.69%	6.34%	8.25%	3.23%	8.36%
TILVX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund	5.21%	5.96%	3.04%	4.90%	4.57%	3.77%	2.26%	7.05%	4.68%	2.01%	3.14%	4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SECIX and TILVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, SECIX and TILVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SECIX or TILVX?

TILVX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to SECIX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECIX dropped -62.58% vs TILVX's -60.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TILVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.