PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECEX vs. VITPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECEX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECEX achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly higher than VITPX's 11.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SECEX having a 14.69% annualized return and VITPX not far ahead at 15.10%.


SECEX

1D
-0.60%
1M
7.41%
YTD
14.10%
6M
13.95%
1Y
31.19%
3Y*
23.41%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
14.69%

VITPX

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.07%
YTD
11.14%
6M
10.88%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECEX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SECEX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund
14.10%16.04%25.74%26.72%-21.98%28.21%17.76%29.62%-7.18%21.99%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.14%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-5.59%20.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SECEX and VITPX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

0.98

The correlation between SECEX and VITPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECEX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECEX
SECEX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SECEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SECEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECEX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SECEXVITPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.42

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.17

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

14.64

-0.71

SECEX vs. VITPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the VITPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECEX and VITPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SECEXVITPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.32

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.75

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.82

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.50

-0.19

Drawdowns

SECEX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECEX drawdown since its inception was -73.88%, which is greater than VITPX's maximum drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECEX and VITPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECEXVITPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.88%

-55.28%

-18.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-8.92%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-19.35%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.55%

-25.31%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.59%

-34.99%

-0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.76%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.68%

-8.02%

-12.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

1.93%

+0.32%

Volatility

SECEX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) at 3.05%. This indicates that SECEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VITPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECEXVITPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

3.05%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

9.20%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

12.22%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

17.35%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

18.41%

-0.30%

SECEX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECEX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECEX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison

SECEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than VITPX's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SECEX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund
2.59%2.95%23.10%2.50%40.57%4.58%9.21%1.57%22.52%18.80%1.94%12.32%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.26%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SECEX and VITPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SECEX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to VITPX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECEX dropped -73.88% vs VITPX's -55.28%.

SECEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECEX and VITPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer