SECA.DE vs. DBXP.DE
SECA.DE (iShares Euro Government Bond Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and DBXP.DE (Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF) are both European Government Bonds funds - SECA.DE tracks the FTSE Advanced Climate Risk-Adjusted European Monetary Union Government Bond while DBXP.DE tracks the iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 1-3. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SECA.DE returned -2.22%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for DBXP.DE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SECA.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for DBXP.DE.
Performance
SECA.DE vs. DBXP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECA.DE achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than DBXP.DE's 0.04% return.
SECA.DE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 0.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.33%
- 5Y*
- -2.22%
- 10Y*
- —
DBXP.DE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 0.89%
- 3Y*
- 2.61%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 0.22%
SECA.DE vs. DBXP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECA.DE iShares Euro Government Bond Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.13% | 0.69% | 1.43% | 6.89% | -18.10% | -3.27% | 1.18% |
DBXP.DE Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF | 0.04% | 2.21% | 2.99% | 3.41% | -4.59% | -0.85% | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SECA.DE and DBXP.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2020 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SECA.DE and DBXP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SECA.DE vs. DBXP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SECA.DE
DBXP.DE
SECA.DE vs. DBXP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc (SECA.DE) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (DBXP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SECA.DE | DBXP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.13 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 0.64 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.02 | 2.08 | -2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SECA.DE | DBXP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 0.65 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.40 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 0.56 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
SECA.DE vs. DBXP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.52%, which is greater than DBXP.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECA.DE and DBXP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECA.DE | DBXP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.52% | -6.77% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.48% | -1.24% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.05% | -1.24% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -5.67% | -15.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.23% | -0.55% | -13.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.15% | -1.00% | -12.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 0.39% | +0.98% |
Volatility
SECA.DE vs. DBXP.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Euro Government Bond Climate UCITS ETF EUR Acc (SECA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (DBXP.DE) at 0.46%. This indicates that SECA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SECA.DE | DBXP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 0.46% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.61% | 1.11% | +2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.38% | 1.22% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 1.65% | +4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 1.80% | +4.32% |
SECA.DE vs. DBXP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECA.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DBXP.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SECA.DE vs. DBXP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SECA.DE nor DBXP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SECA.DE and DBXP.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SECA.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SECA.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for DBXP.DE.
SECA.DE tracks FTSE Advanced Climate Risk-Adjusted European Monetary Union Government Bond, while DBXP.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 1-3. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SECA.DE and 0.15% for DBXP.DE.
Find the right allocation for SECA.DE and DBXP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer