PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEAB.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEAB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SEAB.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEAB.DE achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.


SEAB.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.85%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
6.47%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*

EUNA.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
0.18%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.29%
1Y
1.18%
3Y*
2.28%
5Y*
-1.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEAB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SEAB.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
1.46%7.70%5.52%5.69%-12.28%-0.75%1.22%4.80%-2.51%
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.46%2.79%1.60%4.36%-13.52%-2.37%3.70%5.06%0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SEAB.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2018

0.37

Over the past year, SEAB.DE and EUNA.DE have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEAB.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEAB.DE
SEAB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SEAB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEAB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEAB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SEAB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEAB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEAB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SEAB.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEAB.DEEUNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.06

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

0.43

+2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.50

1.18

+11.32

SEAB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEAB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEAB.DE and EUNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEAB.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

0.34

+1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

-0.28

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

-0.05

+0.27

Drawdowns

SEAB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEAB.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.05%, roughly equal to the maximum EUNA.DE drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEAB.DE and EUNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEAB.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.05%

-17.79%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.09%

-2.75%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.41%

-4.02%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.05%

-17.03%

-1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-8.66%

+8.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-6.76%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.99%

-0.51%

Volatility

SEAB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SEAB.DE) is 0.79%, while iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that SEAB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEAB.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

1.35%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

2.82%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64%

3.46%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.44%

4.64%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.13%

4.27%

+0.86%

SEAB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEAB.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEAB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEAB.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SEAB.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for SEAB.DE.

SEAB.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. SEAB.DE tracks JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Diversified 3% capped 1-5 (EUR Hedged), while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for SEAB.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEAB.DE and EUNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer