PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDUS.L vs. SUUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SDUS.L is traded in USD, while SUUS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SUUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDUS.L achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than SUUS.L's 13.88% return.


SDUS.L

1D
0.08%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.89%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*

SUUS.L

1D
0.21%
1M
5.73%
YTD
13.88%
6M
15.13%
1Y
24.69%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SDUS.L
iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
10.25%17.72%26.89%30.69%-21.32%28.28%22.03%30.98%-7.54%
SUUS.L
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
13.88%11.25%13.92%23.78%-18.70%31.68%25.25%32.47%-4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SDUS.L and SUUS.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.88

The correlation between SDUS.L and SUUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDUS.L
SUUS.L

Technology

38.0%
41.6%

Financial Services

12.4%
11.8%

Communication Services

12.1%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
9.3%

Healthcare

9.2%
8.6%

Industrials

7.7%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
5.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.1%

Energy

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.5%

Utilities

1.3%
1.5%

Technology

SDUS.L
38.0%
SUUS.L
41.6%

Financial Services

SDUS.L
12.4%
SUUS.L
11.8%

Communication Services

SDUS.L
12.1%
SUUS.L
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SDUS.L
10.8%
SUUS.L
9.3%

Healthcare

SDUS.L
9.2%
SUUS.L
8.6%

Industrials

SDUS.L
7.7%
SUUS.L
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SDUS.L
2.7%
SUUS.L
5.4%

Real Estate

SDUS.L
2.0%
SUUS.L
2.1%

Energy

SDUS.L
1.9%
SUUS.L

-

Basic Materials

SDUS.L
1.8%
SUUS.L
2.5%

Utilities

SDUS.L
1.3%
SUUS.L
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDUS.L vs. SUUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDUS.L
SDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SUUS.L
SUUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDUS.LSUUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.75

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

10.70

+1.78

SDUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDUS.L and SUUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDUS.LSUUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.02

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.70

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.92

-0.02

Drawdowns

SDUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SUUS.L drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDUS.L and SUUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDUS.LSUUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-32.59%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-8.93%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.29%

-19.94%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-26.32%

+0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

0.00%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-4.60%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

2.30%

-0.02%

Volatility

SDUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) is 3.55%, while iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that SDUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDUS.LSUUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.88%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

9.28%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

12.16%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

16.02%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

16.38%

+1.85%

SDUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SUUS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SDUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Dividend Comparison

SDUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while SUUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SDUS.L
iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.73%0.80%0.90%1.06%1.32%0.95%1.18%1.40%0.22%
SUUS.L
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDUS.L and SUUS.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUUS.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SDUS.L and 0.20% for SUUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDUS.L and SUUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer