PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDOW vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDOW vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDOW achieves a -20.41% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOW has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of -38.66%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.26% annualized return.


SDOW

1D
0.32%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
-20.41%
6M
-18.40%
1Y
-43.24%
3Y*
-33.77%
5Y*
-25.99%
10Y*
-38.66%

SSO

1D
-2.86%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
12.95%
6M
10.86%
1Y
42.28%
3Y*
33.83%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
24.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDOW vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDOW
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30
-20.41%-33.94%-25.95%-28.78%4.00%-49.00%-66.48%-49.54%-0.30%-52.26%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
12.95%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SDOW and SSO is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

-0.92

The correlation between SDOW and SSO shifts across timeframes, from -0.92 (all time) to -0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDOW vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDOW
SSO

Financial Services

83.7%
25.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.1%

Energy

-

2.2%

Healthcare

-

5.7%

Industrials

-

5.2%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

-

24.9%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Financial Services

SDOW
83.7%
SSO
25.1%

Basic Materials

SDOW

-

SSO
1.2%

Communication Services

SDOW

-

SSO
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SDOW

-

SSO
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

SDOW

-

SSO
3.1%

Energy

SDOW

-

SSO
2.2%

Healthcare

SDOW

-

SSO
5.7%

Industrials

SDOW

-

SSO
5.2%

Real Estate

SDOW

-

SSO
1.2%

Technology

SDOW

-

SSO
24.9%

Utilities

SDOW

-

SSO
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDOW vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDOW
SDOW Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDOW vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDOWSSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.30

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.01

2.34

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.70

9.90

-11.60

SDOW vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDOW Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDOW and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDOW vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDOW drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than SSO's maximum drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOW and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDOWSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-84.67%

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.83%

-18.17%

-24.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.55%

-35.21%

-40.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.15%

-46.73%

-36.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.29%

-59.34%

-39.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-6.70%

-93.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.59%

-19.53%

-70.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.36%

4.28%

+23.08%

Volatility

SDOW vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) has a higher volatility of 12.39% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 9.70%. This indicates that SDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDOWSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.39%

9.70%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.43%

19.65%

+9.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.16%

24.92%

+12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.43%

33.85%

+10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.13%

35.93%

+16.20%

SDOW vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDOW vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

SDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than SSO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDOW
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30
5.85%5.80%8.30%5.38%0.36%0.00%0.52%2.17%1.23%0.09%0.00%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.65%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDOW and SSO have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDOW has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to SSO (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOW dropped -99.96% vs SSO's -84.67%.

On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.26% vs -38.66% for SDOW. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 9.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.26% return vs -38.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SDOW.

SDOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 0.65% for SSO.

SDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDOW and 0.87% for SSO.

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDOW and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer