PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDOW vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDOW vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDOW achieves a -18.49% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 21.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOW has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of -38.16%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.38% annualized return.


SDOW

1D
-1.52%
1M
-10.30%
YTD
-18.49%
6M
-21.02%
1Y
-42.78%
3Y*
-33.02%
5Y*
-25.27%
10Y*
-38.16%

SSO

1D
0.27%
1M
10.52%
YTD
21.07%
6M
21.28%
1Y
56.67%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
20.39%
10Y*
24.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDOW vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDOW
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30
-18.49%-33.94%-25.95%-28.78%4.00%-49.00%-66.48%-49.54%-0.30%-52.26%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
21.07%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SDOW and SSO is -0.83, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

-0.92

The correlation between SDOW and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDOW vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDOW
SSO

Financial Services

74.6%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

SDOW
74.6%
SSO
11.8%

Basic Materials

SDOW

-

SSO
1.8%

Communication Services

SDOW

-

SSO
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SDOW

-

SSO
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

SDOW

-

SSO
4.9%

Energy

SDOW

-

SSO
3.5%

Healthcare

SDOW

-

SSO
8.5%

Industrials

SDOW

-

SSO
8.3%

Real Estate

SDOW

-

SSO
1.9%

Technology

SDOW

-

SSO
35.6%

Utilities

SDOW

-

SSO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDOW vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDOW
SDOW Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDOW vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDOWSSODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.19

2.42

-3.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.81

3.03

-4.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.40

-0.61

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

3.21

-4.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.58

14.14

-15.72

SDOW vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDOW Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDOW and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDOWSSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.19

2.42

-3.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.57

0.61

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.73

0.68

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.78

0.42

-1.20

Drawdowns

SDOW vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDOW drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than SSO's maximum drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOW and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDOWSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-84.67%

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.45%

-18.17%

-25.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.39%

-35.21%

-39.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.35%

-46.73%

-35.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.26%

-59.34%

-39.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

0.00%

-99.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.43%

-19.57%

-69.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.35%

4.13%

+23.22%

Volatility

SDOW vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.46%. This indicates that SDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDOWSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.83%

5.46%

+3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.90%

17.74%

+10.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.02%

23.57%

+12.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.26%

33.65%

+10.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.13%

35.90%

+16.23%

SDOW vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDOW vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

SDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than SSO's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDOW
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30
5.71%5.80%8.30%5.38%0.36%0.00%0.52%2.17%1.23%0.09%0.00%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.61%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDOW and SSO have a correlation of -0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDOW has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to SSO (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOW dropped -99.96% vs SSO's -84.67%.

On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.38% vs -38.16% for SDOW. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.38% return vs -38.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SDOW.

SDOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 0.61% for SSO.

SDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDOW and 0.87% for SSO.

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDOW and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer