SDOW vs. DYLG
SDOW (ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30) and DYLG (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOW is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%), while DYLG is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe DJIA Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SDOW returned -39.90% vs 17.86% for DYLG. At a correlation of -0.98, they often move in opposite directions. SDOW charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DYLG.
Performance
SDOW vs. DYLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOW achieves a -15.72% return, which is significantly lower than DYLG's 4.63% return.
SDOW
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- -10.23%
- YTD
- -15.72%
- 6M
- -16.21%
- 1Y
- -39.90%
- 3Y*
- -32.27%
- 5Y*
- -24.52%
- 10Y*
- -37.95%
DYLG
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDOW vs. DYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 | -15.72% | -33.94% | -25.95% | -13.60% |
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 4.63% | 12.50% | 14.46% | 4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOW and DYLG is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023 | -0.98 |
The correlation between SDOW and DYLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
SDOW vs. DYLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOW
DYLG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SDOW
DYLG
Basic Materials
SDOW
-
DYLG
Communication Services
SDOW
-
DYLG
Consumer Cyclical
SDOW
-
DYLG
Consumer Defensive
SDOW
-
DYLG
Energy
SDOW
-
DYLG
Healthcare
SDOW
-
DYLG
Industrials
SDOW
-
DYLG
Real Estate
SDOW
-
DYLG
-
Technology
SDOW
-
DYLG
Utilities
SDOW
-
DYLG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOW vs. DYLG — Risk / Return Rank
SDOW
DYLG
SDOW vs. DYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDOW | DYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.35 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 2.16 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | 8.78 | -10.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDOW | DYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.11 | 1.90 | -3.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | 1.10 | -1.88 |
Drawdowns
SDOW vs. DYLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOW drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than DYLG's maximum drawdown of -13.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOW and DYLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOW | DYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -13.98% | -85.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.45% | -8.31% | -35.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -0.65% | -99.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.43% | -1.86% | -87.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.47% | 2.04% | +25.43% |
Volatility
SDOW vs. DYLG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) at 2.46%. This indicates that SDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOW | DYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.86% | 2.46% | +6.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.01% | 7.46% | +20.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.20% | 9.44% | +26.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.29% | 11.44% | +32.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.13% | 11.44% | +40.69% |
SDOW vs. DYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DYLG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOW vs. DYLG - Dividend Comparison
SDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, less than DYLG's 9.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 9.54% | 9.63% | 16.55% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 | 5.52% | 5.80% | 8.30% | 5.38% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.17% | 1.23% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOW and DYLG have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDOW has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to DYLG (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOW dropped -99.96% vs DYLG's -13.98%.
On 1-year performance, DYLG leads with 17.86% vs -39.90% for SDOW. On fees, DYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DYLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DYLG has performed better with a 17.86% return vs -39.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SDOW.
DYLG has the higher dividend yield at 9.54%, compared with 5.52% for SDOW.
SDOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DYLG is Derivative Income. SDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%), while DYLG tracks Cboe DJIA Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDOW and 0.35% for DYLG.
DYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOW and DYLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer