PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDHG.L vs. WIGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDHG.L vs. WIGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDHG.L achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly higher than WIGG.L's 1.47% return.


SDHG.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.12%
YTD
2.17%
6M
3.15%
1Y
11.14%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
7.60%

WIGG.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.71%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDHG.L vs. WIGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SDHG.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.17%3.69%10.34%4.51%9.19%6.61%1.92%7.77%12.55%
WIGG.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.47%8.82%4.80%11.01%-12.90%4.06%13.22%14.56%-3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SDHG.L and WIGG.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2018

0.08

The correlation between SDHG.L and WIGG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDHG.L vs. WIGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDHG.L
SDHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SDHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

WIGG.L
WIGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
WIGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDHG.L vs. WIGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDHG.LWIGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.13

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

8.95

+2.48

SDHG.L vs. WIGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the WIGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDHG.L and WIGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDHG.LWIGG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.98

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.46

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.63

+0.22

Drawdowns

SDHG.L vs. WIGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDHG.L drawdown since its inception was -11.44%, smaller than the maximum WIGG.L drawdown of -23.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHG.L and WIGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDHG.LWIGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.44%

-23.44%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-3.52%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.95%

-4.30%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.53%

-17.35%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.10%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-3.59%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.84%

+0.11%

Volatility

SDHG.L vs. WIGG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L) at 1.30%. This indicates that SDHG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WIGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDHG.LWIGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.30%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.11%

2.97%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.88%

3.80%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.58%

5.92%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.19%

7.44%

+1.75%

SDHG.L vs. WIGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDHG.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than WIGG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDHG.L vs. WIGG.L - Dividend Comparison

SDHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.18%, more than WIGG.L's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDHG.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
11.18%8.87%8.03%7.20%5.20%5.72%6.58%6.95%7.01%7.33%6.99%7.49%
WIGG.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
6.92%5.58%5.74%5.08%4.47%3.89%4.24%4.53%3.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDHG.L and WIGG.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SDHG.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDHG.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WIGG.L.

SDHG.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while WIGG.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR HGBP. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDHG.L and 0.55% for WIGG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDHG.L and WIGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer