PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDHG.L vs. TAHY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDHG.L vs. TAHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) and Janus Henderson Haitong Asia ex-Japan High Yield Corporate USD Bond Screened Core UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TAHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SDHG.L is traded in GBP, while TAHY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TAHY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDHG.L achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than TAHY.L's 3.40% return.


SDHG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.28%
6M
1.92%
YTD
2.20%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
4.47%
ALL TIME*
1.82%

TAHY.L

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.99%
6M
1.88%
YTD
3.40%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
6.97%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-3.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDHG.L vs. TAHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SDHG.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.20%1.29%8.41%2.88%8.13%2.52%
TAHY.L
Janus Henderson Haitong Asia ex-Japan High Yield Corporate USD Bond Screened Core UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
3.40%-0.38%19.59%-15.20%-8.69%-11.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SDHG.L and TAHY.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2021

0.45

The correlation between SDHG.L and TAHY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDHG.L vs. TAHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDHG.L
SDHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SDHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

TAHY.L
TAHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TAHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TAHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDHG.L vs. TAHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) and Janus Henderson Haitong Asia ex-Japan High Yield Corporate USD Bond Screened Core UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TAHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDHG.LTAHY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.13

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

0.92

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

2.26

+2.42

SDHG.L vs. TAHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the TAHY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDHG.L and TAHY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDHG.L vs. TAHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDHG.L drawdown since its inception was -39.18%, roughly equal to the maximum TAHY.L drawdown of -40.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHG.L and TAHY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDHG.LTAHY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.18%

-40.62%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.79%

-5.98%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.95%

-7.70%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-15.32%

+13.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.47%

-21.35%

+8.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

2.43%

-1.13%

Volatility

SDHG.L vs. TAHY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) is 1.38%, while Janus Henderson Haitong Asia ex-Japan High Yield Corporate USD Bond Screened Core UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TAHY.L) has a volatility of 2.17%. This indicates that SDHG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAHY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDHG.LTAHY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

2.17%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

5.89%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

7.52%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.49%

14.73%

-7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.64%

14.73%

-6.09%

SDHG.L vs. TAHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDHG.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TAHY.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDHG.L vs. TAHY.L - Dividend Comparison

SDHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, while TAHY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDHG.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
6.77%6.56%6.32%5.63%4.24%4.19%5.08%5.39%5.41%5.60%5.32%4.92%
TAHY.L
Janus Henderson Haitong Asia ex-Japan High Yield Corporate USD Bond Screened Core UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDHG.L and TAHY.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SDHG.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDHG.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TAHY.L.

SDHG.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while TAHY.L tracks iBoxx MSCI Scored & Screened Tilted USD Asia ex-Japan High Yield Capped TCA Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDHG.L and 0.60% for TAHY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDHG.L and TAHY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer