PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDHG.L vs. FLOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SDHG.L vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SDHG.L vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDHG.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.01%3.69%10.34%4.51%9.19%6.61%1.92%7.77%7.80%-3.56%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
2.41%-2.56%8.39%1.11%13.32%1.40%-2.09%0.01%7.50%-7.14%
Different Trading Currencies

SDHG.L is traded in GBP, while FLOT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLOT values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDHG.L achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT's 2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SDHG.L has outperformed FLOT with an annualized return of 7.63%, while FLOT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.70% annualized return.


SDHG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
1.01%
YTD
2.01%
6M
4.73%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
7.63%

FLOT

1D
-0.33%
1M
1.23%
YTD
2.41%
6M
3.58%
1Y
1.82%
3Y*
3.37%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
3.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SDHG.L vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDHG.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SDHG.L vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDHG.L
SDHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SDHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDHG.L vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDHG.LFLOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

0.25

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

0.40

+1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.05

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

0.35

+1.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.87

0.70

+4.17

SDHG.L vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDHG.L and FLOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDHG.LFLOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.25

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.57

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.37

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.39

+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between SDHG.L and FLOT is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SDHG.L vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

SDHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than FLOT's 4.68% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDHG.L
iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
11.20%8.87%8.03%7.20%5.20%5.72%6.58%6.95%7.01%7.33%6.99%7.49%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.68%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%

Drawdowns

SDHG.L vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDHG.L drawdown since its inception was -11.44%, smaller than the maximum FLOT drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHG.L and FLOT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SDHG.LFLOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.44%

-13.54%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.04%

-1.57%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.53%

-2.36%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.44%

-13.54%

+2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.16%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-0.21%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

0.20%

+1.26%

Volatility

SDHG.L vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) is 1.75%, while iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that SDHG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SDHG.LFLOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

2.38%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.20%

4.78%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.07%

7.32%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.63%

8.63%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.22%

10.00%

-0.78%