PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDAY.NEO vs. FCMI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDAY.NEO vs. FCMI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF (SDAY.NEO) and Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF (FCMI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDAY.NEO achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than FCMI.TO's 9.25% return.


SDAY.NEO

1D
-1.13%
1M
2.43%
6M
7.41%
YTD
15.24%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FCMI.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.44%
6M
6.69%
YTD
9.25%
1Y
19.66%
3Y*
13.93%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDAY.NEO vs. FCMI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SDAY.NEO and FCMI.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDAY.NEO vs. FCMI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDAY.NEO
SDAY.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SDAY.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDAY.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDAY.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SDAY.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDAY.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FCMI.TO
FCMI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FCMI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDAY.NEO vs. FCMI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF (SDAY.NEO) and Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF (FCMI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDAY.NEOFCMI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.80

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

5.36

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

20.62

-12.25

SDAY.NEO vs. FCMI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDAY.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the FCMI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDAY.NEO and FCMI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDAY.NEO vs. FCMI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDAY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -7.75%, smaller than the maximum FCMI.TO drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDAY.NEO and FCMI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDAY.NEOFCMI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-63.80%

+56.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-3.62%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-18.96%

+15.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.74%

-41.59%

+39.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

0.94%

+1.47%

Volatility

SDAY.NEO vs. FCMI.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF (SDAY.NEO) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF (FCMI.TO) at 2.08%. This indicates that SDAY.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCMI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDAY.NEOFCMI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

2.08%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

4.99%

+4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

6.39%

+5.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

7.80%

+4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.17%

22.19%

-10.02%

SDAY.NEO vs. FCMI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FCMI.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDAY.NEO vs. FCMI.TO - Dividend Comparison

SDAY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.07%, more than FCMI.TO's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FCMI.TO
Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF
3.28%3.38%3.63%4.09%3.73%2.76%6.22%
SDAY.NEO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF
18.07%8.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDAY.NEO and FCMI.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCMI.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCMI.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SDAY.NEO.

SDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while FCMI.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SDAY.NEO and 0.50% for FCMI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDAY.NEO and FCMI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer