PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCVAX vs. VSMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCVAX vs. VSMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCVAX having a 16.22% return and VSMVX slightly higher at 16.60%. Over the past 10 years, SCVAX has underperformed VSMVX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while VSMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.38% annualized return.


SCVAX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.94%
YTD
16.22%
6M
15.76%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
9.78%

VSMVX

1D
1.11%
1M
3.59%
YTD
16.60%
6M
16.14%
1Y
38.88%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
5.95%
10Y*
10.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCVAX vs. VSMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
16.22%1.75%8.22%15.19%-12.13%36.81%1.99%22.20%-14.18%11.58%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
16.60%6.38%7.53%14.85%-11.12%30.85%2.79%24.47%-12.67%11.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SCVAX and VSMVX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2012

0.97

The correlation between SCVAX and VSMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCVAX vs. VSMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCVAX
SCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMVX
VSMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VSMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCVAX vs. VSMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCVAXVSMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

4.47

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

14.73

-4.16

SCVAX vs. VSMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the VSMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCVAX and VSMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCVAXVSMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.28

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.27

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.43

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.50

-0.05

Drawdowns

SCVAX vs. VSMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCVAX drawdown since its inception was -70.30%, which is greater than VSMVX's maximum drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCVAX and VSMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCVAXVSMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.30%

-47.61%

-22.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-9.33%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-28.81%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.83%

-28.81%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.64%

-47.61%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-7.64%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.83%

-0.17%

Volatility

SCVAX vs. VSMVX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCVAXVSMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

4.48%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

11.51%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.95%

18.32%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.71%

22.02%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

24.13%

-0.90%

SCVAX vs. VSMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCVAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCVAX vs. VSMVX - Dividend Comparison

SCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than VSMVX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
5.06%5.88%8.23%0.77%4.33%6.02%0.39%0.48%0.71%0.30%0.04%0.13%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.63%1.45%1.85%1.92%1.88%1.66%1.46%1.65%1.89%1.55%1.26%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SCVAX and VSMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCVAX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to VSMVX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCVAX dropped -70.30% vs VSMVX's -47.61%.

VSMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCVAX and VSMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer