PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCVAX vs. STNFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCVAX vs. STNFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCVAX achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than STNFX's 6.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SCVAX has underperformed STNFX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while STNFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.82% annualized return.


SCVAX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.94%
YTD
16.22%
6M
15.76%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
9.78%

STNFX

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.45%
YTD
6.71%
6M
5.30%
1Y
18.70%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
16.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCVAX vs. STNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
16.22%1.75%8.22%15.19%-12.13%36.81%1.99%22.20%-14.18%11.58%
STNFX
Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund
6.71%14.63%30.44%40.91%-30.86%15.76%32.30%47.33%1.22%33.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SCVAX and STNFX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between SCVAX and STNFX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCVAX vs. STNFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCVAX
SCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

STNFX
STNFX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
STNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
STNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
STNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
STNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCVAX vs. STNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCVAXSTNFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

1.09

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

3.19

+7.38

SCVAX vs. STNFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the STNFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCVAX and STNFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCVAXSTNFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.26

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.51

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.73

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.70

-0.24

Drawdowns

SCVAX vs. STNFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCVAX drawdown since its inception was -70.30%, which is greater than STNFX's maximum drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCVAX and STNFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCVAXSTNFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.30%

-43.46%

-26.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-17.69%

+9.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-22.45%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.83%

-43.46%

+16.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.64%

-43.46%

-3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.49%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-7.54%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

6.01%

-3.35%

Volatility

SCVAX vs. STNFX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX) at 3.10%. This indicates that SCVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCVAXSTNFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.10%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

11.57%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.95%

15.34%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.71%

23.45%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

22.97%

+0.26%

SCVAX vs. STNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCVAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than STNFX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCVAX vs. STNFX - Dividend Comparison

SCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than STNFX's 13.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
5.06%5.88%8.23%0.77%4.33%6.02%0.39%0.48%0.71%0.30%0.04%0.13%
STNFX
Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund
13.17%14.06%14.18%18.68%10.88%15.11%13.51%19.01%30.81%22.67%5.50%5.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCVAX and STNFX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCVAX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to STNFX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCVAX dropped -70.30% vs STNFX's -43.46%.

SCVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCVAX and STNFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer