SCVAX vs. STNFX
SCVAX (Allspring Small Company Value Fund) and STNFX (Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - SCVAX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Allspring Global Investments, while STNFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Allspring Global Investments. Over the past 10 years, SCVAX returned 9.78%/yr vs 16.82%/yr for STNFX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCVAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for STNFX.
Performance
SCVAX vs. STNFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCVAX achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than STNFX's 6.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SCVAX has underperformed STNFX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while STNFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.82% annualized return.
SCVAX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 16.22%
- 6M
- 15.76%
- 1Y
- 26.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
STNFX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 18.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.82%
SCVAX vs. STNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund | 16.22% | 1.75% | 8.22% | 15.19% | -12.13% | 36.81% | 1.99% | 22.20% | -14.18% | 11.58% |
STNFX Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund | 6.71% | 14.63% | 30.44% | 40.91% | -30.86% | 15.76% | 32.30% | 47.33% | 1.22% | 33.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCVAX and STNFX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCVAX and STNFX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCVAX vs. STNFX — Risk / Return Rank
SCVAX
STNFX
SCVAX vs. STNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCVAX | STNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 1.09 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.57 | 3.19 | +7.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCVAX | STNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.26 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.51 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.73 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.70 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
SCVAX vs. STNFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCVAX drawdown since its inception was -70.30%, which is greater than STNFX's maximum drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCVAX and STNFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCVAX | STNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.30% | -43.46% | -26.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.21% | -17.69% | +9.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.83% | -22.45% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.83% | -43.46% | +16.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.64% | -43.46% | -3.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -0.49% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -7.54% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 6.01% | -3.35% |
Volatility
SCVAX vs. STNFX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX) at 3.10%. This indicates that SCVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCVAX | STNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 3.10% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 11.57% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.95% | 15.34% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 23.45% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 22.97% | +0.26% |
SCVAX vs. STNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCVAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than STNFX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCVAX vs. STNFX - Dividend Comparison
SCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than STNFX's 13.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund | 5.06% | 5.88% | 8.23% | 0.77% | 4.33% | 6.02% | 0.39% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.30% | 0.04% | 0.13% |
STNFX Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund | 13.17% | 14.06% | 14.18% | 18.68% | 10.88% | 15.11% | 13.51% | 19.01% | 30.81% | 22.67% | 5.50% | 5.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCVAX and STNFX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCVAX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to STNFX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCVAX dropped -70.30% vs STNFX's -43.46%.
SCVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCVAX and STNFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer