PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCVAX vs. SMAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCVAX vs. SMAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Allspring Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund (SMAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCVAX achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than SMAIX's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SCVAX has outperformed SMAIX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while SMAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.


SCVAX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.94%
YTD
16.22%
6M
15.76%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
9.78%

SMAIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.30%
1Y
3.16%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
1.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCVAX vs. SMAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
16.22%1.75%8.22%15.19%-12.13%36.81%1.99%22.20%-14.18%11.58%
SMAIX
Allspring Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund
1.04%3.62%3.54%3.37%-0.64%0.28%1.13%2.18%1.43%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SCVAX and SMAIX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCVAX vs. SMAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCVAX
SCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SMAIX
SMAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SMAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCVAX vs. SMAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Allspring Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund (SMAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCVAXSMAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

3.75

-2.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

7.71

-4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

36.46

-25.89

SCVAX vs. SMAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the SMAIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCVAX and SMAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCVAXSMAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

3.29

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

1.94

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

1.78

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.40

-0.95

Drawdowns

SCVAX vs. SMAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCVAX drawdown since its inception was -70.30%, which is greater than SMAIX's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCVAX and SMAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCVAXSMAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.30%

-1.92%

-68.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-0.41%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-1.14%

-25.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.83%

-1.92%

-24.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.64%

-1.92%

-44.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-0.15%

-10.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

0.09%

+2.57%

Volatility

SCVAX vs. SMAIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Allspring Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund (SMAIX) at 0.27%. This indicates that SCVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCVAXSMAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

0.27%

+4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

0.69%

+10.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.95%

0.96%

+15.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.71%

1.13%

+19.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

0.95%

+22.28%

SCVAX vs. SMAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCVAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAIX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCVAX vs. SMAIX - Dividend Comparison

SCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than SMAIX's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCVAX
Allspring Small Company Value Fund
5.06%5.88%8.23%0.77%4.33%6.02%0.39%0.48%0.71%0.30%0.04%0.13%
SMAIX
Allspring Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund
2.91%3.03%2.84%1.93%0.93%0.48%1.12%1.74%1.42%0.98%0.77%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCVAX and SMAIX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCVAX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to SMAIX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCVAX dropped -70.30% vs SMAIX's -1.92%.

SMAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCVAX and SMAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer