SCSC vs. QCOM
SCSC (ScanSource, Inc.) and QCOM (QUALCOMM Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — SCSC in Electronics & Computer Distribution, QCOM in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, SCSC returned 3.02%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for QCOM. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCSC vs. QCOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCSC achieves a 37.89% return, which is significantly higher than QCOM's 8.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SCSC has underperformed QCOM with an annualized return of 3.02%, while QCOM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.01% annualized return.
SCSC
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 30.92%
- YTD
- 37.89%
- 1Y
- 30.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 3.02%
QCOM
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -13.10%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
SCSC vs. QCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCSC ScanSource, Inc. | 37.89% | -17.68% | 19.79% | 35.56% | -16.70% | 32.98% | -28.61% | 7.48% | -3.97% | -11.28% |
QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 8.65% | 13.84% | 8.31% | 35.07% | -38.58% | 22.25% | 77.08% | 60.76% | -7.59% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCSC and QCOM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 1994 | 0.28 |
The correlation between SCSC and QCOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SCSC:
$1.09B
QCOM:
$193.91B
SCSC:
$3.33
QCOM:
$9.14
SCSC:
16.18
QCOM:
20.12
SCSC:
0.38
QCOM:
4.49
SCSC:
1.28
QCOM:
7.23
SCSC:
$3.09B
QCOM:
$44.49B
SCSC:
$416.89M
QCOM:
$24.38B
SCSC:
$122.21M
QCOM:
$12.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCSC vs. QCOM — Risk / Return Rank
SCSC
QCOM
SCSC vs. QCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCSC | QCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.12 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 0.59 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 1.21 | +1.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCSC vs. QCOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCSC drawdown since its inception was -76.88%, smaller than the maximum QCOM drawdown of -86.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSC and QCOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCSC | QCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.88% | -86.75% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.52% | -33.13% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.21% | -44.23% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.21% | -44.29% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.54% | -44.29% | -23.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -26.44% | +26.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.81% | -32.84% | +11.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.78% | 16.04% | -5.26% |
Volatility
SCSC vs. QCOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) is 6.32%, while QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) has a volatility of 19.09%. This indicates that SCSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCSC | QCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 19.09% | -12.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.76% | 45.20% | -14.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.31% | 51.25% | -12.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 41.83% | -4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.89% | 39.57% | +0.32% |
Dividends
SCSC vs. QCOM - Dividend Comparison
SCSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 1.95% | 2.06% | 2.18% | 2.18% | 2.67% | 1.47% | 1.69% | 2.81% | 4.27% | 3.50% | 3.17% | 3.72% |
SCSC ScanSource, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SCSC vs. QCOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ScanSource, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SCSC vs. QCOM - Profitability Comparison
SCSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ScanSource, Inc. reported a gross profit of 107.12M and revenue of 766.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.
QCOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a gross profit of 5.70B and revenue of 10.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.8%.
SCSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ScanSource, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.12M and revenue of 766.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.
QCOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported an operating income of 2.31B and revenue of 10.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
SCSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ScanSource, Inc. reported a net income of 16.89M and revenue of 766.79M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
QCOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a net income of 7.37B and revenue of 10.60B, resulting in a net margin of 69.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCSC and QCOM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCOM has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to SCSC (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSC dropped -76.88% vs QCOM's -86.75%.
SCSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCSC and QCOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer