PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCSBX vs. AAAZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Total Return Bond Fund (SCSBX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCSBX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than AAAZX's 10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SCSBX has underperformed AAAZX with an annualized return of 2.04%, while AAAZX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.49% annualized return.


SCSBX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.61%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
-0.31%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
2.04%

AAAZX

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
10.77%
6M
11.27%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
11.68%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
7.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCSBX
DWS Total Return Bond Fund
-0.10%6.53%2.28%6.34%-15.13%-0.10%8.81%11.02%-2.72%5.89%
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
10.77%13.14%5.49%2.64%-9.57%23.83%3.91%21.79%-5.05%14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSBX and AAAZX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007

0.11

The correlation between SCSBX and AAAZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.38 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCSBX vs. AAAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCSBX
SCSBX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SCSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SCSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAZX
AAAZX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AAAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Total Return Bond Fund (SCSBX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCSBXAAAZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.88

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

2.57

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.99

-1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.79

10.95

-6.16

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCSBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the AAAZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCSBX and AAAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCSBXAAAZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.88

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.44

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.59

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.40

+0.65

Drawdowns

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSBX drawdown since its inception was -21.02%, smaller than the maximum AAAZX drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSBX and AAAZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCSBXAAAZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.02%

-40.45%

+19.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

-5.68%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.27%

-10.15%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.53%

-22.52%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.53%

-29.44%

+9.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-2.73%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-6.62%

+3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.54%

-0.41%

Volatility

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Total Return Bond Fund (SCSBX) is 1.34%, while DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that SCSBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCSBXAAAZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

2.53%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

7.32%

-4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91%

9.03%

-5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.78%

12.14%

-6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.76%

12.71%

-7.95%

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSBX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAZX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Dividend Comparison

SCSBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than AAAZX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
3.74%4.15%2.85%2.40%4.50%2.62%1.60%2.07%1.89%1.79%1.82%2.53%
SCSBX
DWS Total Return Bond Fund
4.77%4.36%4.55%3.91%3.13%2.47%2.30%3.53%3.82%3.19%2.55%3.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCSBX and AAAZX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAAZX has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to SCSBX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSBX dropped -21.02% vs AAAZX's -40.45%.

AAAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCSBX and AAAZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer