SCSBX vs. AAAZX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SCSBX (DWS Total Return Bond Fund) and AAAZX (DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund) are both mutual funds - SCSBX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by DWS, while AAAZX is a Global Allocation fund managed by DWS. Over the past 10 years, SCSBX returned 1.97%/yr vs 7.37%/yr for AAAZX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCSBX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AAAZX.

Performance

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Total Return Bond Fund (SCSBX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCSBX achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than AAAZX's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SCSBX has underperformed AAAZX with an annualized return of 1.97%, while AAAZX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.37% annualized return.

SCSBX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 6M: -0.21%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: 4.09%
• 5Y*: -0.31%
• 10Y*: 1.97%

AAAZX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -3.34%
• YTD: 8.70%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 13.84%
• 3Y*: 11.32%
• 5Y*: 5.18%
• 10Y*: 7.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCSBX DWS Total Return Bond Fund	-0.32%	6.53%	2.28%	6.34%	-15.13%	-0.10%	8.81%	11.02%	-2.72%	5.89%
AAAZX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund	8.70%	13.14%	5.49%	2.64%	-9.57%	23.83%	3.91%	21.79%	-5.05%	14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSBX and AAAZX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2007	0.12

The correlation between SCSBX and AAAZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SCSBX vs. AAAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCSBX

SCSBX Risk / Return Rank: 16
SCSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SCSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
SCSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SCSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
SCSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

AAAZX

AAAZX Risk / Return Rank: 37
AAAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
AAAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
AAAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
AAAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
AAAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Total Return Bond Fund (SCSBX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCSBX	AAAZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.55	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	2.12	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.28	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	2.54	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	8.18	-4.64

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCSBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the AAAZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCSBX and AAAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSBX drawdown since its inception was -21.02%, smaller than the maximum AAAZX drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSBX and AAAZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCSBX	AAAZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.02%	-40.45%	+19.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.36%	-5.68%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.27%	-10.15%	+3.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.53%	-22.52%	+2.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.53%	-29.44%	+9.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.30%	-4.56%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.82%	-6.61%	+3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.21%	1.75%	-0.54%

Volatility

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Total Return Bond Fund (SCSBX) is 1.10%, while DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that SCSBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCSBX	AAAZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.10%	2.54%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	7.48%	-4.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.85%	9.29%	-5.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.79%	12.11%	-6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.77%	12.72%	-7.95%

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSBX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAZX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCSBX vs. AAAZX - Dividend Comparison

SCSBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than AAAZX's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAAZX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund	1.79%	4.15%	2.85%	2.40%	4.50%	2.62%	1.60%	2.07%	1.89%	1.79%	1.82%	2.53%
SCSBX DWS Total Return Bond Fund	4.34%	4.36%	4.55%	3.91%	3.13%	2.47%	2.30%	3.53%	3.82%	3.19%	2.55%	3.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCSBX and AAAZX in my portfolio?

SCSBX and AAAZX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCSBX or AAAZX?

AAAZX has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to SCSBX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSBX dropped -21.02% vs AAAZX's -40.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.