PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCSAX vs. BTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCSAX vs. BTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCSAX achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly higher than BTMFX's 7.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCSAX having a 10.73% annualized return and BTMFX not far behind at 10.49%.


SCSAX

1D
0.94%
1M
-0.46%
6M
11.39%
YTD
15.04%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
10.73%
ALL TIME*
9.02%

BTMFX

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.06%
6M
5.10%
YTD
7.85%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
10.49%
ALL TIME*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SCSAX vs. BTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCSAX
Allspring Common Stock Fund
15.04%1.44%6.51%15.90%-17.71%21.14%15.34%47.23%-10.02%17.54%
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
7.85%4.29%10.27%13.06%-10.91%24.77%9.72%33.00%-3.36%20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSAX and BTMFX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.92

The correlation between SCSAX and BTMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCSAX vs. BTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCSAX
SCSAX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SCSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SCSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BTMFX
BTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCSAX vs. BTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCSAXBTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.11

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

3.09

+1.58

SCSAX vs. BTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCSAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the BTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCSAX and BTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCSAX vs. BTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSAX drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, which is greater than BTMFX's maximum drawdown of -49.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSAX and BTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCSAXBTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.49%

-49.26%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.68%

-7.79%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.64%

-17.77%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.46%

-20.79%

-17.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.63%

-37.14%

-8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-0.76%

-2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-6.12%

-4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

2.81%

+0.80%

Volatility

SCSAX vs. BTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX) at 3.47%. This indicates that SCSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCSAXBTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

3.47%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

8.19%

+6.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.85%

11.76%

+7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.95%

15.74%

+8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.95%

17.38%

+6.57%

SCSAX vs. BTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSAX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BTMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCSAX vs. BTMFX - Dividend Comparison

SCSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than BTMFX's 10.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
10.07%10.86%4.23%4.41%4.71%4.91%1.98%6.95%5.96%6.61%7.03%6.60%
SCSAX
Allspring Common Stock Fund
3.84%4.42%6.38%3.56%17.66%19.38%4.87%26.88%18.74%11.05%3.82%12.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCSAX and BTMFX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCSAX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to BTMFX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSAX dropped -53.49% vs BTMFX's -49.26%.

SCSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCSAX and BTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer